HOLYROOD’S pro-independence majority is a “strength not a weakness” the First Minister has said, in defence of the Bute House Agreement with the Scottish Greens.
Humza Yousaf was speaking during a Holyrood Sources live podcast event in Edinburgh on Tuesday night, where he told the audience that the cooperation deal would remain intact until 2026, the next scheduled Scottish Parliament election.
The FM insisted that the “political stability” brought by the power-sharing deal was “worth its weight in gold”.
READ MORE: Scotland Office spends more than £75k on hospitality in 16 months
He also said he believed that the Scottish Greens pushed the SNP to go further to embed tackling the climate crisis in their legislation, but refuted the suggestion that the junior party in the Government were “taking the SNP for a ride”.
Yousaf also suggested that his win during the SNP leadership, where he vocally supported continuing the Bute House Agreement signed by Nicola Sturgeon in 2021, meant that there had been a recent “check in” with the membership.
There have been repeated calls for members to be allowed a vote on whether or not the Bute House Agreement should continue during summer recess.
While he said he was not in charge of the agenda for the upcoming SNP conference in October, Yousaf said he thought a vote on it would be unlikely.
“The economy is central” to the next general election, Scottish First Minister @HumzaYousaf tells #HolyroodSourcesLive 🎙️ pic.twitter.com/wpKsh2h1UP
— Holyrood Sources (@HolyroodSources) August 15, 2023
Asked what he was going to do to “arrest that perception” in regards to the Scottish Greens and the current arrangements, which gave co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater ministerial roles in the Scottish Government, he pointed to the recent decision to scrap Highly Protected Marine Areas after a backlash from fishing communities.
He told the podcast: “Let’s remember we’re the ones in the Scottish Government, who have for example, changed course in relation to HPMAs, we heard the community’s response vocally about that.
“Ultimately again before the UK Government took action in relation to vetoing and talking down the DRS [deposit return scheme], when I came in and we said right, we need to listen to our business community around the readiness of that scheme.
“So let's delay, let's make changes, let's listen to those business concerns. They are absolutely legitimate.”
Yousaf said that he accepted that while voters may not care about electoral processes, they do care if “legislation is passed because it impacts them”.
READ MORE: Scotland Office's lavish spending on hospitality – see the full list
He continued: “For those that do believe in independence, like me, having a pro-independence majority in parliament I think is an absolute strength, not a weakness.
“I actually think genuinely, this is more of a bubble story, I'm sorry to say, it does not get referenced to me on many doorsteps.
“It comes up on occasion for sure, it comes up when I speak to them about the A96 in the north east, so it definitely comes up, but I have to say it is not number one, number two, number three issue that comes up time and time again.”
Asked if the Scottish Greens exert influence on the Scottish Government, Yousaf pointed out that there was “no doubt” because they are part of the Scottish Government.
Probed if that was “too much influence”, he replied: “No, I believe they absolutely have influence, I believe they push us to go further on certain issues.”
Yousaf refuted that the Scottish Greens pushed the SNP to go “further than they’d like”, but admitted that they had pushed them to go further than their original manifesto promises.
“Perhaps further than we thought we’d go, not further than we’d like,” he said.
When it was suggested that this might be difficult for voters who voted for the SNP manifesto at the Holyrood election, Yousaf said: “No I don’t think it is because people want to see political parties work together.
READ MORE: Labour respond to calls to 'block Scottish independence spending'
“We have this agreement, this co-operation agreement. We were voted in as a minority government, we have to accept that, not far off from a majority, but as a minority government, therefore the message is you should cooperate with other political parties to progress your political agenda.”
Earlier, Yousaf told the podcast that there are some policies that were excluded from the Bute House Agreement because both parties disagreed, adding that despite this they were “working together in the best interests of Scotland”.
He added that there were pragmatic reasons for the agreement, such as getting legislation passed.
“The Parliament, I can tell you now, for the 12 years that I was elected, it is by far the most toxic I’ve ever been in and we’ve all got responsibility to detoxify it as best we possibly can.
“But there’s no way I’m passing a Budget that Douglas Ross is going to vote for or Anas Sarwar is going to vote for, it just isn’t going to happen in a month of Sunday’s.
“Having that political stability, that majority in parliament, not just to pass your Budget, but your legislative programme, for me is worth its weight in gold, absolutely.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel