STEPHEN Flynn has criticised Anas Sarwar for falling into line behind Keir Starmer and “hoping the public doesn’t notice”.
The SNP Westminster leader hit out at Sarwar for taking a different line on policies when Starmer isn’t in Scotland.
The UK Labour leader and Sarwar were speaking at an event in Rutherglen on Tuesday where they were taken to task by STV’s Colin Mackay over the divergence in policy between the two on key issues – like the two-child benefit cap.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf: Pro-independence majority is 'strength not a weakness'
The two leaders were attempting to put on a show of unity, with Starmer insisting that the pair are "welded" together and “singing from the same hymn sheet”.
However, there have been a number of evident splits on the policy positions of the two leaders in recent weeks, with Sarwar stating that he would call for the two-child benefit to be scrapped, while Starmer has said he would not if his party wins the next General Election.
Sarwar also backed the Scottish Government’s gender reforms, while Starmer has said he would not support the introduction of self-ID for transgender people.
Despite this, both leaders tried to show unity during an event in Rutherglen, ahead of the crucial by-election due to be held in October.
🤷🏼♂️ Want to know how a political branch office works?
— Stephen Flynn MP (@StephenFlynnSNP) August 16, 2023
😤 When your boss isn’t in town you tell the public that you will “press” him to scrap a policy.
🥰 But when your boss does come to visit, you just agree with him and hope the public don’t notice.pic.twitter.com/rO3myRt6To
In an STV news clip, Sarwar said his “view has not changed” and said Labour was right to oppose the two-child limit and campaign against it.
“But I’m also honest about accepting that we cannot go into an election making unfunded spending commitments,” he said.
“It would be wrong to say to people that we’re going to make promises we can’t keep.
“We do not know the economic mismanagement that we’re going to inherit, we don’t know the economic carnage that we’re going to inherit.”
Meanwhile, Starmer told journalists: “I think, I mean, you’ve heard Anas’s explanation about unfunded spending commitments, about being honest, that is exactly the way in which I’ve put the argument and would put the argument.
READ MORE: Popular Scottish ferry route cancelled for the rest of 2023
“I think that only reinforces that we are singing from the same hymn sheet.”
However, Flynn and plenty of others were quick to criticise the so-called show of unity between the two party leaders.
The SNP MP said: “Want to know how a political branch office works?
“When your boss isn’t in town you tell the public that you will 'press' him to scrap a policy.
“But when your boss does come to visit, you just agree with him and hope the public don’t notice.”
The STV News clip has been viewed over 166k times in less than 24 hours, with plenty of criticism aimed at Sarwar and Starmer.
SNP MP John Nicolson wrote: “They’ll fund Trident to the tune of billions. Brexit? Here’s some more billions. The poor? We cannot promise to fund measures to reverse the rape clause / two-child benefit cap.
“What on earth is the point of Scottish Labour?”
Culture minister Christina McKelvie added: “I think Anas and his optional identity mark team in Scotland have been telt by Sir Starmer as always Labour in Scotland are as feeble as they’ve ever been.”
READ MORE: Graham Linehan considers legal action over cancelled Edinburgh show
South Lanarkshire SNP councillor Tony Gurney said: “Can’t fault this for accuracy on the two child cap given that it is @UKLabour policy, but pretending that there are two different parties with the option of different policies is wildly misleading.”
While Angus SNP councillor Lloyd Melville blasted: “Anas is no different to other Labour leaders. He does what he’s told by his boss in London. Confirmed here.”
One social media user branded Sarwar’s comments as a “humiliating climbdown”.
We previously reported how Starmer said during the campaign visit that Labour would impose the two-child benefit cap “more fairly” than the Tories.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel