FORMER finance secretary Kate Forbes has torn into “ridiculous mistruths” from the chief executive of a pro-Union think tank.
Sam Taylor, who runs These Islands, had taken aim at the SNP MSP over a comment she made in a column for The National.
Writing on the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures ahead of their publication on Wednesday, Forbes said: “Firstly, the figures illustrate that most of the decisions are still made by the UK Government – not a fully empowered Government of an independent Scotland.
“The bottom line is that approximately 70% of the revenue figures (i.e. taxation) and 40% of the spending figures are reserved.
One of many columns on GERS today, stating a few relevant facts and concluding that any criticism of the figures is implicitly a criticism of the status quo (ie the public finances and economy of the UK). You can’t ignore the need for change…https://t.co/jjbW3S7bvd
— Kate Forbes MSP (@_KateForbes) August 16, 2023
“That means that the UK Government controls, in full, the powers and decision-making to arrive at those reserved figures.
“That includes areas that are fully controlled by the UK Government such as pensions, or areas where the UK Government spends an overall amount and an estimate is accounted to the Scottish people, based on geography or population share, like defence, foreign affairs, aid, debt payments and North Sea oil.”
Quoting Forbes’s article, Taylor said it showed that the former finance secretary wanted to “cut the state pension in an independent Scotland”.
READ MORE: Support for Scottish independence up three points, new polling finds
Taylor wrote on X, the website formerly called Twitter: “Bold pitch from @_KateForbes, who complains that UK Gov is spending too much on pensions, which makes Gers look bad for Scotland.
“The inescapable implication is that fiscal hawk Forbes would cut the state pension in an independent Scotland, to bring down the deficit.”
Hitting back, the SNP MSP accused Taylor of spinning “ridiculous mistruths”.
Delightfully amusing to see Mr Taylor having to spin far-fetched & ridiculous mistruths on today of all days. Thankfully everybody reading this is literate (& highly intelligent) so I've got full confidence they'll understand what I wrote, rather than accept this bonkers take. https://t.co/9XvzEqYu3a
— Kate Forbes MSP (@_KateForbes) August 16, 2023
She wrote: “Delightfully amusing to see Mr Taylor having to spin far-fetched and ridiculous mistruths on today of all days.
“Thankfully everybody reading this is literate (and highly intelligent) so I've got full confidence they'll understand what I wrote, rather than accept this bonkers take.”
Taylor responded to insist that the “implication” in Forbes’s statement was that she would “do things differently” than the UK’s current state pension system.
In a separate tweet promoting her column, Forbes had said she was "stating a few relevant facts and concluding that any criticism of the figures is implicitly a criticism of the status quo".
The row comes on “Gers day”, the annual publication of the figures estimating Scotland’s notional deficit as a part of the United Kingdom.
READ MORE: British agents have infiltrated SNP government and 'influence' policy, ex-MSP claims
The GERS figures for 2022-2023 showed public spending north of the Border amounted to £106.6 billion in 2022-23 – up by £9.3bn (9.5%) on the previous year.
The amount raised in taxes also rose to an estimated £87.5bn, including a record £9.4 billion in North Sea revenues.
This increased from £2.4bn in 2021-22 following the introduction of the UK Government’s energy profits levy – a windfall tax on the oil and gas industry.
Total revenue for Scotland increased by £15bn (20.7%), which compares to growth of 11.3% for the UK as a whole.
As well as the rise in North Sea revenues, Scottish Government income from other sources increased by £8.1bn (11.5%) – including a £1.9bn rise from Scottish income tax.
Overall, the GERS figures estimated that the country had a £19.1bn deficit – the equivalent of 9% of GDP. The UK as a whole had a deficit of 5.2% of GDP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel