ANAS Sarwar has reportedly refused to say if he would vote for Holyrood’s gender reforms again – despite voting for them in the first place.
The Scottish Labour leader appears to have embarked on another U-turn after Keir Starmer’s visit to Scotland earlier this week.
Despite the majority of his MSPs – bar two who voted against and two who did not turn up for the vote – backing the legislation, Sarwar declined to say if he would vote for the Gender Recognition Reform Bill again, according to a BBC reporter.
READ MORE: BBC slated for giving junior doctors pay deal 15 SECONDS on TV bulletin
Sarwar also voted for the legislation, but now appears to suggest that the party should have been more “conditional” in their support for the bill and pushed on the amendments they put forward, many of which they dropped during the stage three process.
It comes as Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner joined Sarwar on a visit to Glasgow on Thursday to meet with apprentices.
UK Labour has scaled back its commitment to introducing self-identification for transgender people in recent months.
Starmer has previously said that a system allowing people to legally identify as their chosen gender, as the Scottish legislation would have allowed, is not the “right way forward”.
On Thursday, Sarwar told the BBC that Scottish Labour “perhaps should have been harder in terms of [support] being conditional on the amendments that we put forward on that legislation”.
Reporter David Wallace Lockhart tweeted that Sarwar also refused to say if he would back the Holyrood bill again.
Rayner told the BBC that both UK and Scottish Labour want to “protect women’s rights” and transgender rights.
Scottish Labour have been contacted for comment and asked to clarify the party’s position on self-ID and Holyrood's gender reforms.
READ MORE: Steve Barclay's former aide calls for NHS 'full privatisation'
SNP MSP Karen Adam said: "The rights of trans people should not be up for debate.
"Anas Sarwar's decision to roll back on his principled support for the GRR Bill - given to party members during his leadership election - shows exactly where the power within Scottish Labour lies - with his bosses at Westminster."
Rayner has previously said the party is committed to creating a more “supportive process” to help people transition and said that transgender rights are “not in conflict” with women’s rights.
On Labour’s changing position on trans rights, Rayner told Radio 4’s Today programme: “We have talked about the Gender Recognition Act, we have talked about reform, we have talked about a process.
“Of course there has to be a process for people that is supportive and that is when you get into the weeds of how you ensure that we do have trans rights that are compatible and compassionate and humane.
“At the moment the process isn’t, and we have acknowledged that, that there are problems with the process, and therefore there has to be a process that is a supportive process that recognises that people can transition and that we do that in a way that is supportive of those people.”
In February, Sarwar said he did not regret supporting the Scottish Government’s gender reforms but insisted tighter curbs on sex offenders should have been introduced.
In an interview with the Daily Record, Sarwar was asked if he regretted his support.
READ MORE: Angela Rayner launches bizarre English campervan tour
“No, I think it’s important to stress that we have taken a good faith approach from start to finish,” he said.
“We were very honest at stage one of that process that we didn’t think the legislation was anywhere near good enough, so we supported it based on its principles.”
Sarwar caveated that he thought the Scottish Government was “wrong” in terms of rejecting amendments around sex offenders and single-sex spaces.
Scottish Labour MSPs dropped a number of amendments during the lengthy stage three process, many of which were instead moved by Scottish Tory MSPs who were trying to drag out proceedings.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel