LABOUR'S deputy leader has been slammed for refusing to support the devolution of employment law to Scotland.
Responding to the SNP’s call for employment law to be devolved to Holyrood, Keir Starmer's deputy Angela Rayner insisted it was unnecessary during a visit to Glasgow.
She claimed that Labour’s “new deal” for workers would be enough, setting out the party’s plans to protect against unfair dismissal, banning zero hour contracts and fire and rehire policies, as well as introducing sick pay from day one.
READ MORE: Kezia Dugdale: I can't argue for the Union like I used to
However, the SNP’s social justice spokesperson David Linden said that under Starmer the party would rather the rights of Scottish workers were “ripped up by Westminster, than protected at Holyrood”.
It comes after the UK Government passed the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill which introduces provisions for the minimum requirement for emergency services, education and transport services during industrial action.
First Minister Humza Yousaf also challenged Rayner to commit to full devolution for employment law ahead of her visit, pointing out that Scotland had avoided any NHS strikes - unlike Labour-run Wales.
During her visit to the Royal Strathclyde Blindcraft Industries Training College on Thursday, Rayner said: “They won’t need it because I want employment law across the whole of the United Kingdom to be uplifted and better. That’s why we’ve got a new deal for working people.
“I want a new deal for working people to be here in Scotland so we have those protections of employment law.”
She added employment practices would be “in effect across the board” rather than split off across the four UK nations.
And Rayner said she did not want to see “disparities” across the different parts of the UK.
In response to her comments, SNP MP Linden said: “Labour and the Tories have worked hand-in-glove for years to block the devolution of employment law to Scotland. Instead, Westminster has focused its efforts on imposing an agenda of austerity that Scotland didn’t vote for.
READ MORE: BBC slated for giving junior doctors pay deal 15 SECONDS on TV bulletin
“With regressive policies like the Anti-Strike Bill, it is clear workers’ rights are under a concerted attack.
“Neither the Tories or Labour at Westminster can be trusted to protect these hard-fought rights. Power over employment law must be handed to Scotland’s Parliament where workers’ rights can be defended and strengthened under progressive leadership.
Linden (below) said that Labour once “proudly brandished itself” as the party of the workers.
“How far they have fallen under Sir Keir Starmer, that they would rather the rights of Scottish workers were ripped up by Westminster, than protected at Holyrood,” he added.
“With the full powers of independence, we can escape this broken Westminster system, strengthen workers’ rights and enshrine them into Scotland’s written constitution for good.”
We told how international politicians condemned the introduction of the anti-strike bill, which means that employers would be able to demand staff show up for work even if their union was taking industrial action, due to the minimum service level requirements imposed by the legislation.
The UK Government was warned that the bill would put the UK in breach of European human rights rules.
We also told how all six of Scotland’s Tory MPs voted to ensure the UK Government’s legislation also impacts workers north of the Border.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel