A CAMPAIGN group has written to the standards watchdog calling for an investigation into Nadine Dorries following a poll which suggested more than half of people believe her absence has damaged Parliament’s reputation.
Director of Unlock Democracy Tom Brake has called for an inquiry after the group commissioned an Opinium survey that found 55% of people though Dorries had caused significant damage by failing to speak in Parliament and delaying her decision to quit.
The survey of 2000 people explained Dorries announced she was stepping down with immediate effect in early June although she is yet to officially quit.
It added that she has not spoken in Parliament in more than a year despite continuing to receive her full salary as an MP.
READ MORE: Michael Matheson offers to help Steve Barclay in junior doctors' talks
Given the option of whether or not this significantly damaged the reputation of Parliament, 55% said it had done so, while 22% said it had not and 23% said they didn’t know.
Standards commissioner Daniel Greenberg had previously written to the group saying it was an extremely high bar for an investigation into an MP on these grounds and that it had not been proven that Dorries’ actions had caused significant damage.
The MP and former culture secretary (below) made a written contribution in parliament when she laid a ministerial statement in early September 2022.
She last voted in the House of Commons in April while the Prime Minister has been among those to publicly criticise her.
“I think people deserve to have an MP that represents them, wherever they are. It’s just making sure your MP is engaging with you, representing you, whether that’s speaking in Parliament or being present in their constituencies doing surgeries, answering your letters.
“That’s the job of an MP and all MPs should be held to that standard”, Sunak previously told LBC.
Dorries said she was quitting Parliament to trigger a by-election when former prime minister Boris Johnson stood down as an MP.
The National has approached Dorries for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel