SENIOR Conservatives have been accused of being “anti-freedom” after calling for Rishi Sunak to intervene over an advertising “boycott” of some TV channels.
A group of high-profile Tories, including former prime minister Liz Truss, has written to the Prime Minister urging him to cut ties with the Conscious Advertising Network (Can), which campaigns to break “the economic link between advertising and the harmful content that divides communities”.
The 46-strong group accused Can of posing “a threat to freedom of speech and media plurality in this country”, saying it “intimidates and bullies companies into boycotting news outlets”, leading to “a media that does not reflect the diversity of views of modern Britain”.
Signatories including former party leader Iain Duncan Smith, former home secretary Priti Patel and several members of the right-wing Common Sense Group urged the Government to distance itself from Can.
READ MORE: Demand for action as Orkney jury trials transferred to mainland
Can was a contributor to a recent Government consultation on online advertising, and the letter called for Sunak to ensure “its politically motivated activists are kept well away from government policy”.
In a statement on Twitter, Can said: “The proposal for state intervention in the advertising industry called for in this letter is anti-freedom and anti-choice. Advertisers should be allowed to make commercial decisions that grow their brands and, by extension, the British economy.
“This means that hateful content and disinformation, wherever it is directed, is not commercially attractive for many. Do the MPs not support advertisers’ freedom to choose where they advertise, and ordinary Briton’s right to freedom from harm?”
In addition to its criticism of Can, the MPs’ letter accused five major advertising agencies – WPP, Publicis, Dentsu, Omnicom and the Interpublic Group – of engaging in an effective “boycott” of “certain Ofcom-regulated TV channels”.
The MPs said: “This ‘opt out’ – effectively a boycott – has been implemented via stealth without public scrutiny or regulatory oversight, and is leading to a two-tiered society, where ad agencies and brands are actively discriminating between consumers on the basis of their political views. This discrimination must not be allowed to take root.”
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar labels criticism of Keir Starmer 'unfair'
The letter did not specify which channels have been subject to the “boycott”, but several brands have said they will not advertise on GB News - a channel which employs numerous Conservative MPs as presenters.
In June 2022, the channel’s chief executive, Angelos Frangopoulos, said the action was damaging GB News’ business and was “dangerous for public debate and freedom of speech”.
Last month, Can co-founders Harriet Kingaby and Jake Dubbins denied that they had ever called for a boycott of any TV channel or other media platform.
Advertising agencies advise on ad placement, but the decision on where to buy advertising space is ultimately up to their individual clients, with some continuing to advertise on channels such as GB News.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel