KEIR Starmer has said his dreams of going to university as a teenager would nowadays have been crushed because it costs too much, despite dropping a pledge to scrap tuition fees earlier this year.
The Labour leader – who went to Leeds University before studying at Oxford as a postgrad - said the impact on young people that fees have “should shame the Conservatives” and accused the Government of a "deep betrayal of aspirational Britain".
The remarks would appear slightly paradoxical given Starmer ditched a promise to get rid of tuition fees if he became prime minister, with them currently standing at £9250 a year.
He told the Daily Telegraph: "There wasn't any spare money knocking around to fund me going to Leeds. I worked before I went and then got by on grants, as many young people do. I vividly remember carefully calculating rent, bills and food.
READ MORE: Luxury Scottish store boss defends 'North African attendants' statues
“Going to Leeds to study was a turning point for me. It will be a deep betrayal if one of the legacies of this Tory government is university, apprenticeships and skills becoming the preserve of the wealthy.
"Tory economic failure choking off the dreams of the next generation is a deep betrayal of aspirational Britain. Talent and aspiration should drive young people - not the affordability of rent, or soaring food prices.
"I vividly remember the excitement of moving to Leeds to study law. It was a financial stretch then. If I were a student today, I wouldn't be able to go."
Back in May, he said Labour would be moving on from its commitment to abolishing tuition fees.
He said: "We are likely to move on from that commitment because we do find ourselves in a different financial situation."
Fees for university were first introduced by Tony Blair in 1998 at the maximum price of £1000 per year. They were abolished in Scotland in 2000 after devolution.
Speaking to LBC on Tuesday morning, Starmer pledged to change the "unfair" student funding system south of the Border but did not specify how he would do this.
Asked about his plans, he said: “I do think the current scheme is unfair and ineffective and that is why we will change it, so the current scheme will be changed by the incoming Labour government and we will set out our plans.
READ MORE: Scottish drug misuse deaths decrease to lowest rate since 2017
“I am not going to pretend that there isn’t huge damage to the economy and that has meant that some of the things that an incoming Labour government would want to do we are not going to be able to do in the way we would want.
"But it doesn’t mean we are going to leave the current system as it is, because we want a fairer deal for students, a more effective deal for students and for universities.”
Pressed again on what Labour’s offer might be, Starmer said: “We are working up our proposals on that and I will fully come back and talk them through when we got them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel