AN SNP MP has called out a major energy company for its “thuggish” behaviour after he received a letter threatening forced entry with a “dog handler”.
MP for Ochil and South Perthshire John Nicolson posted a letter from OVO Energy on his social media.
Nicolson (below) says the company told him he owed more than £1000 and the letter explained that someone had visited to talk about “overdue debt on your energy account”.
It explained that the company’s next step would be to apply for a “Rights of Entry Warrant” and that “if needed, we’ll bring a dog handler”.
In response to the letter, Nicolson said: “As a @BBCWatchdog presenter & MP I’ve encountered a few unsavoury firms.
“But how about @OVOEnergy for thuggery? They claimed I owed more than £1k (I didn’t – they’d sent an estimate).
“They threatened forced entry with a ‘dog handler’. Imagine someone vulnerable getting this.”
Seems @OVOEnergy don't like the publicity I've given their thuggish letter. They're now pretending the thuggery was uncharacteristic. But they've got form. I got their bosses to compensate a constituent with Parkinson's whom they'd made cry with their nasty brutal behaviour. pic.twitter.com/ywe6AZgHL3
— JOHN NICOLSON M.P. (@MrJohnNicolson) August 23, 2023
Replying to Nicolson on Twitter, OVO said they were “very sorry” he had received the letter and that it “should never have been sent”.
“The language in it does not match the letters we send out today and we are investigating with our agencies how this happened.
“The team will also be in touch by private message to fix your billing issue”, a statement said.
However, Nicolson took issue with the reply and said: “Your thuggish letter isn’t historic. You sent it only last month.
“What you mean is you didn’t expect your company publicly shamed – your letter read by tens of thousands of people.”
READ MORE: Greens contact police after Patrick Harvie faces slur at campaign event
He later added: “Seems @OVOEnergy don’t like the publicity I’ve given their thuggish letter.
“They’re now pretending the thuggery was uncharacteristic. But they’ve got form. I’ve got their bosses to compensate a constituent with Parkinson’s whom they’d made cry with their nasty, brutal behaviour.”
The National approached OVO Energy for further comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel