THE boss of the Post Office has said he will return all of his bonus payment linked to the Horizon inquiry regarding hundreds of wrongfully convicted postmasters.
Nick Read, chief executive of the Post Office, also apologised again for “procedural and governance mistakes made”.
Around 700 Post Office workers were convicted, and some sent to prison, for theft and false accounting between 2000 and 2014.
It was later revealed that errors linked to the Fujistu Horizon software were to blame.
The boss has said that he will voluntarily return part of the £455,000 bonus he received for the 2021-22 financial year. It is understood this part of the bonus is £54,400.
This includes around £13,000 of Read’s bonus which he had previously committed to returning.
The company has not said whether other workers who received bonus payments linked to the inquiry will also return these significant payments.
READ MORE: There must be justice for victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal
The Post Office told Darren Jones MP, chair of the House of Commons business and trade committee, that 33 employees had paid back a total of £64,252 in payments linked to the inquiry sub-metric.
In response, Jones threatened to haul bosses from the business back in front of the committee after it refused to fully commit to clawing back all executive bonuses linked to the inquiry.
On Wednesday, Read said: “I have made a personal decision to return voluntarily the full bonus payment attributed to the overall inquiry metric in the 2021/22 annual report and accounts.
“While neither the Simmons & Simmons report nor the Amanda Burton report found any basis to support suggestions of impropriety, and both stated that there was a justifiable basis to make the award, I hope this action will allow Post Office to redouble its focus on fully addressing the wrongs of the past and serving today’s postmasters.
“I would like to reiterate Post Office’s sincere apology for the procedural and governance mistakes made.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel