AN ex-Labour MP has accused the party of tailoring policy to the English middle-class and “abandoning everything they’ve ever stood for” in a damning verdict on Keir Starmer’s series of U-turns.
Les Huckfield – who was a member of the party for 40 years serving as an MP and MEP between 1967 and 1989 – said there was hardly a piece of Labour’s 2019 manifesto that remained in tact and argued Starmer’s current approach was going down “like a lead balloon” in Scotland.
He spoke to The National after shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves announced Labour were no longer going to commit to introducing a wealth tax despite previous pledges to do so.
Reeves also ruled out an increase to the top rate of income tax – something which was pledge number one in Starmer’s now-infamous “10 Pledges”.
READ MORE: Scotland set to BLOCK plan for King Charles portrait in schools
Both policies were promised in Scottish Labour's 2019 manifesto – though their 2021 manifesto only backed a tax rise on the highest incomes if necessary.
Huckfield (below) said an accumulation of U-turns from Starmer and the likes of Wes Streeting saying Labour would use private companies to tackle NHS waiting lists have left him at a loss as to what the party’s principles are.
He told The National: “I can no longer tell you – and I ought to be able to tell you as I feel I’m fairly well versed in politics – what the party stands for.
“If you add together the Wes Streeting stuff on involving the private sector and having a go at Sadiq Khan over Ulez [ultra-low emission zone], and lots of other bits and pieces, I can’t tell you what they stand for.
“The interesting thing is, I really don’t think the Starmer crowd understand at all that this goes down like a lead balloon in Scotland.
“When Michael Shanks [Labour’s by-election candidate in Rutherglen and Hamilton West] is in Rutherglen and Anas Sarwar says 'we’re talking about a fresh start', a fresh start to me seems to be that you abandon all you’ve ever stood for.
“It’s obviously tailored for an English, middle-class audience. I can’t imagine that it’s going to appeal to anyone in Scotland, particularly as – and Starmer does not seem to realise this – there is another left-of-centre party in Scotland, namely the SNP.
“You can’t take away from the SNP that on child poverty, with the increased child allowance and the work to mitigate the bedroom tax, that that is well to the left of anything the Labour party now stands for.”
Huckfield, despite leaving the party in 2003, said he had a “small hand” in writing parts of the 2017 and 2019 Labour manifestos, contributing some content on worker co-operatives.
He said most of the 2019 manifesto had now disappeared.
“There’s hardly a single piece of that 2019 manifesto which is still in tact,” said Huckfield, who supports Scottish independence.
“Almost daily now either Starmer or Reeves says ‘oh actually, we’re not going to do that anymore’.
READ MORE: Scotland reacts to Tory plans to spend millions on Charles portraits
“Working people, particularly in Scotland, must be wondering what on earth Starmer stands for.”
Labour’s latest change of approach on a wealth tax comes after they abandoned the idea of ditching the two-child benefits cap – a move which appeared to cause division either side of the Border.
The party has faced huge questions over its new stance in Rutherglen and Hamilton West – a key seat Labour are hoping to win back from the SNP after the recall of Margaret Ferrier.
Shanks has said he would vote to abolish the two-child cap if he got the seat, but this was branded “not good enough” by First Minister Humza Yousaf, who pointed out Starmer would have to bring a vote on the issue for Shanks to go against it, which he has ruled out.
Huckfield said he had concerns about some of the candidates being selected by Labour, with their candidate in Mid-Bedfordshire – following the resignation of Nadine Dorries - being a Bank of England economist.
“Some of the people who get selected have no real background in politics,” said Huckfield.
“In my day, if you were a bus driver or a postie or train driver, that’s where Labour people came from.
“The person Starmer wants to stand in Nadine Dorries constituency is a Bank of England economist. How is that supposed to cut the ice in mid-Bedfordshire?”
The National has approached Scottish Labour for comment on Labour’s latest U-turn on a wealth tax but has not received a response yet.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel