THE SNP and Scottish Labour would be tied for vote share in a General Election, a new poll has suggested.
The survey from Redfield and Wilton Strategies, released on Wednesday evening, found that both parties would win 35% of the votes at a Westminster election.
This represents a fall of two percentage points for the SNP on the last poll by the firm, while Labour have gained one.
The Conservatives are facing dire straits, according to the polling, which put them on just 15% of the vote.
SNP and Labour are TIED in Scotland.
— Redfield & Wilton Strategies (@RedfieldWilton) September 6, 2023
Scotland Westminster VI (2-4 September):
SNP 35% (-2)
Labour 35% (+1)
Conservative 15% (-2)
Lib Dem 8% (+1)
Green 4% (+2)
Reform 2% (–)
Other 1% (–)
Changes +/- 5-6 Augusthttps://t.co/LEw1GVdqBs pic.twitter.com/8Jf6iNJN51
Pollster Mark McGeoghegan said different seat projections from the results predicted different outcomes. "Lots of urban and central belt marginals in these models, so a high degree of uncertainty," he wrote.
In August, polling expert Professor John Curtice said that “pretty much every seat in Scotland will be a marginal seat” at the next General Election.
At a Holyrood election, the Redfield and Wilton Strategies survey suggested things were equally close between Labour and the SNP. While Humza Yousaf’s governing party leads in the constituency ballot, Labour lead on the regional list.
The poll found that, in a Holyrood election, 39% of people would give the SNP their constituency vote. This compares to 30% for Labour, 16% for the Tories, and 8% for the LibDems. The Scottish Greens and Reform polled at 3%, and Alba at 1%.
In that same election but on the regional list, Labour would win 30% of the vote, the poll suggested, while the SNP won 25%. The Tories were on 15%, with the Greens just one point behind on 14%.
The LibDems polled at 9%, Alba at 4%, and Reform at 3%.
Labour leads the SNP by 5% in regional VI for a Scottish parliamentary election.
— Redfield & Wilton Strategies (@RedfieldWilton) September 6, 2023
Holyrood Regional List VI (2-4 September):
Labour 30% (–)
SNP 25% (-4)
Conservatives 15% (-3)
Green 14% (+5)
Lib Dems 9% (-1)
Alba 4% (+2)
Reform UK 3% (–)
Other 1% (–)
Changes +/- 5-6 August pic.twitter.com/uMrS4XLhIr
The Redfield and Wilton Strategies survey further asked people how they would vote in a Scottish independence referendum, and found a five-point lead for No.
The poll suggested that, if a vote on the Union were held tomorrow, 44% of Scots would back independence while 49% would back remaining a part of the UK.
The Yes vote was down one point since the firm last asked the question, while the No vote had risen by the same.
Scots are however completely evenly split on whether to hold a second vote on independence in the next 12 months. A total of 42% said they would support a ballot, while 42% said they would oppose it.
READ MORE: Laughter in Holyrood as MSPs forget Nicola Sturgeon isn't in power anymore
The polling further found that First Minister Humza Yousaf has a net approval rating of -8, while Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is on -20 and Labour leader Keir Starmer in the positive on 5.
However, despite Yousaf’s negative ratings, 37% of Scots think he would do a better job as first minister than Scottish Labour’s Anas Sarwar, while 29% held the opposite view.
Compared to Scottish Tory group leader Douglas Ross, 42% of Scots said Yousaf would do a better job, while 27% backed the Conservative.
Redfield and Wilton Strategies polled 1100 Scots between September 2 and 4.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel