THE BBC's disinformation and social media correspondent Marianna Spring has been accused of lying on her CV.
The claim stems from when Spring was seeking out work in Russia, according to The New European.
In 2018, the US-based news site Coda Story received a job application from Spring – who is now the first person to hold the specialist disinformation role within the BBC.
READ MORE: Emma Guinness on why monarchy in Scotland should have ended with Queen’s death
The New European reports that in her CV, she wrote: “June 2018: Reported on International News during the World Cup, specifically the perception of Russia, with BBC correspondent Sarah Rainsford.”
However, editor-in-chief Natalia Antelava is then said to have fact-checked the claim and found that Spring had not worked alongside Rainsford.
After being confronted with this, Spring reportedly apologised in an email for her “awful misjudgement”, adding: “I’ve only bumped into Sarah whilst she’s working and chatted to her at various points, but nothing more. Everything else on my CV is entirely true.
“There’s absolute no excuse at all, and I’m really sorry again.
“The only explanation at all is my desperation to report out in Moscow, and thinking that it wouldn’t be a big deal, which was totally naive and stupid of me. I’m really sorry again for this awful misjudgment on my part.”
READ MORE: Alba leads list of most popular names for French baby girls
Antelava encouraged the journalist to use the mistake as a lesson but rejected the application.
She said: “Telling me you are a brilliant reporter who exercises integrity and honesty when you have literally demonstrated the opposite was a terrible idea.”
Spring now works with BBC investigative journalists “countering disinformation”.
She also hosts the BBC’s Marianna in Conspiracyland podcast – which investigates the legacy of conspiracy movements and the role of media in them.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel