NO new offshore wind farms have been commissioned in a key auction, dealing a blow to the UK Government’s hopes of decarbonising electricity production.
In the annual auction which lets companies bid to supply the grid with electricity, many onshore wind projects and solar farms bid to get a contract.
However, no offshore wind contracts, seen as the backbone of the UK’s green electricity ambitions, were included this year, the Government announced.
Stephen Flynn, the SNP's Westminster leader, said the move was "devastating".
Sharing a graphic showing zero offshore wind farms had been greenlit, he wrote: "Westminster knows that costs for offshore wind projects have soared but chose not to react. The consequences of their inaction couldn’t be more stark. Westminster is putting at risk Scotland’s renewable and economic future."
An absolutely devastating graphic.
— Stephen Flynn MP (@StephenFlynnSNP) September 8, 2023
Westminster knows that costs for offshore wind projects have soared but chose not to react.
The consequences of their inaction couldn’t be more stark.
Westminster is putting at risk Scotland’s renewable and economic future. pic.twitter.com/VqQKZxD73M
The failure puts a dent in ministers’ promise to deliver 50 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind by 2030, from 14 GW today.
Wind farm builders had warned for months that the UK Government, which sets a maximum price that companies are allowed to charge, was not taking into account how much their costs had soared during the cost-of-living crisis, which has also pushed up prices for businesses.
“The economics simply did not stand up,” the boss of ScottishPower said on Friday after the result.
Energy and climate change minister Graham Stuart said: “Offshore wind is central to our ambitions to decarbonise our electricity supply and our ambition to build 50GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030, including up to 5GW of floating wind, remains firm.
“The UK installed 300 new turbines last year and we will work with industry to make sure we retain our global leadership in this vital technology.”
One industry source said: “There is no offshore wind and that’s the backbone of our transition to clean energy and attempts to stop using gas, which must be a worry for Government.”
READ MORE: Overlooked Humza Yousaf pledge showed chasm between Scotland and UK
In a press release, the Government said that the scheme was “set to deliver 3.7 GW of homegrown energy”. It did not mention that last year’s auction granted contracts for 11 GW.
Experts warned that this could lead to higher energy bills for British households. Producing offshore wind used to be expensive, but after years of innovation and building up scale, the price of supplying wind power to British homes had dropped dramatically.
New offshore wind turbines now produce electricity at a considerably cheaper rate than gas power plants. The price of gas has soared after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Keith Anderson, the boss of ScottishPower, which is one of the key builders of wind power in the UK, said that offshore wind is still one of the cheapest ways to generate electricity.
“This is a multibillion-pound lost opportunity to deliver low-cost energy for consumers, and a wake-up call for Government,” he said.
“ScottishPower is in the business of building wind farms and our track record is second-to-none in terms of getting projects over the line when others haven’t been able to. But the economics simply did not stand up this time around.”
READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: Energy is our best argument for independence
Greenpeace UK’s policy director, Doug Parr, said: “This monumental failure is the biggest disaster for clean energy in almost a decade.
“Thanks to cost pressures and inept Government policy, this auction round has completely flopped – denying bill payers access to cheap, clean energy and putting the UK’s legally binding target of decarbonising power by 2035 in greater jeopardy. It leaves the UK more dependent on expensive, imported fossil gas.”
Labour shadow energy security and net zero secretary Ed Miliband said: “Ministers were warned time and again that this would happen, but they did not listen.
“They simply don’t understand how to deliver the green sprint, and Rishi Sunak’s Government is too weak and divided to deliver the clean power Britain needs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel