LORD Sugar tried to dodge a £186 million tax bill by attempting to declare himself a non-UK resident.
The crossbench peer in the House of Lords had intended to pay no tax on one of the largest dividends in corporate history - £390 million he drew from his company in 2021-22.
But, a joint investigation by the Sunday Times and Bureau of Investigative Journalism found that Sugar tried to argue he was not based in Britain at the time.
READ MORE: Bute House Agreement has made Greens more popular, says pollster
It turns out Sugar was not aware that his membership of the Lords meant he was automatically resident in the UK.
The billionaire, 26, had tried to argue he qualified for non-residency - a person who does not live in Britain and spends no more than 90 days in the UK a year.
Sugar had spent months in Australia hosting its version of celebrity apprentice, the investigation states.
He had asked authorities to “disregard” the income earned from Amshold Group, the UK holding company that covers his property assets and business ventures, including those formed with winners of the reality TV show The Apprentice.
But, despite his efforts, Sugar was required to pay HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) the entire £186 million.
Reports say that when Sugar learned of the impact of his Lord’s membership, he said he would have quit altogether if he had known it stopped him claiming non-residency.
He took an unexplained leave of absence from the Lords between January and June this year - around the time HMRC would have reviewed his status.
However, there is no exemption in the law for those who temporarily leave the chamber.
READ MORE: Fears UK Government could block disposable vape ban in Scotland
How much tax Sugar is expected to pay on overseas earnings after domiciling himself outside of the UK is not known.
Apparently, Sugar blames his tax advisers for the oversight and is reportedly taking action against them to recover his loss.
The last time he recorded a vote in the chamber was in 2017, and he last took part in a debate the following year.
Sugar was made a Labour peer in 2009. He served as Gordon Brown’s enterprise champion, a role he stayed in under Tory prime minister David Cameron.
He switched his allegiance to the crossbench group in the Lords in 2015.
Sugar has repeatedly made statements that he does not dodge taxes and condemning those who do.
Andrew Bloch, Sugar’s spokesperson, said in a statement: “Lord Sugar is a UK tax resident, and he always has been. All his income has been taxed on the basis of his UK residency, and is fully paid up.”
READ MORE: Shona Robison: 'No decisions' made yet on tax rises at next Budget
Bloch did not respond to questions relating to Sugar’s willingness to resign from the Lords and attempt to domicile himself elsewhere.
Sugar previously called a critic accusing him of tax avoidance an “ignorant twat” on Twitter in 2020.
“It makes no difference where I am in the world,” he wrote on the social media site.
“I am a UK citizen and a taxpayer.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel