A JOURNALISTS' union has demanded an explanation from the BBC after the corporation removed a presenter’s criticism of “deeply unpopular” local radio cuts.
BBC Norfolk presenter Sophie Little made headlines this week after she used the last episode of her cancelled show to brand the organisation “ableist and ageist”.
The NUJ has now expressed concern about the BBC’s editorial approach after it censored her two-minute speech in the BBC Sounds version of the programme.
Bosses have written to the organisation seeking answers, with many members said to be alarmed by its actions.
READ MORE: Republic leader Graham Smith suing Met chief over coronation arrest
The union has also requested an equality impact assessment is carried out into the cuts with local radio staff now formally facing redundancy across England. The organisation is particularly worried about the number of disabled, black and women members of staff being served notice of redundancy.
The BBC – which is cutting and merging shows throughout the week on local stations – admitted it had not undertaken an equality impact assessment of local radio cuts on audiences, many of whom are elderly, disabled, not online or hard to reach.
Shows across 39 stations are disappearing altogether, with longstanding presenters, journalists and producers losing their jobs. Smaller numbers of newsreaders will be forced to pre-record bulletins that are set to be shared across the stations.
Paul Siegert, NUJ broadcast organiser, said: “These plans remain deeply unpopular among staff, audiences, politicians and communities across the country.
“We want to retain as much local programming as possible, and we absolutely want to see news kept live and local. Pre-recording 20 minutes before means news bulletins will miss any breaking stories and seriously undermine the quality of BBC local news.
READ MORE: Richard Tice demands BBC bans EU flags from Last Night of the Proms
“The NUJ is very concerned about the number of disabled, black and women members of staff being served notice of redundancy. By their own admission, BBC needs to do better on diversity of staff, particularly when it comes to disabled staff, yet we’re seeing little consideration given to members with disabilities facing distressing and complicated redeployment and redundancy situations.
“The impact on minority and vulnerable audiences is also considerable, as prompting many charities speaking out across the country. Nobody wants these changes, and the concerns of the listening public have been ignored.”
Little’s criticism came days after pre-legal action was launched by a charity working for blind and visually impaired people which believes the BBC is acting in breach of the Equality Act. Lawyers for blind radio listener Sarah Leadbetter have written to director general Tim Davie.
Back in June, Davie was quizzed by MPs on BBC staff demographics and in response to a question about the BBC pay gap increasing in all areas. He acknowledged the figures and said disability was an area “we need more people in senior roles and that is a challenge”.
The BBC has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel