OFFICIALS have denied accusations of a "cover-up" in after the First Minister was urged to refer himself to a ministerial code adviser in response to his correction on renewable energy.
During First Minister’s Questions (FMQs) in June, Humza Yousaf said Scotland had the majority of the UK’s renewable energy resources, instead of the 26% quoted by officials retrospectively.
He corrected the record two months later, stating he “intended” to refer to per capita figures instead, following a point of order from Conservative MSP Liam Kerr.
Scottish LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton has now urged Yousaf to refer himself to the independent adviser on the ministerial code, accusing him of “manufacturing” the facts.
READ MORE: Census results show Scotland has record high population
It comes after heavily redacted correspondence, released through freedom of information requests, showed Scottish Government officials did not calculate the “per capita” figure until July 3.
The documents, obtained by pro-Union group These Islands, show an official asked for someone to “dig out” the figures, with a subsequent response stating the 26% figure for the UK’s renewable capacity in 2022.
On July 3, civil servants then shared figures which stated Scotland had 651.1GWh per 100,000, higher than any other UK nation, with Northern Ireland recording 239.7, Wales 256.8 and England 153.2GWh.
On August 29, Yousaf wrote to Kerr, who raised the issue as a point of order in June, to correct the record.
The letter was also sent to the Presiding Officer, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and business managers.
Cole-Hamilton, in his letter to the First Minister, said “it appears that a fact may have subsequently been manufactured after June 22 in order to minimise the impact of your need to correct the parliamentary record”, adding it would have therefore been “impossible” for Yousaf to intend to say “per capita”.
Urging Yousaf to refer himself for a possible breach of the ministerial code, he expressed concern that the First Minister misled Parliament after the correction was “only reverse engineered afterwards" to “save embarrassment”.
He added: “I am concerned that in the course of correcting the record in relation to the exchange in June, that you may have knowingly misled Parliament in your letter of August 29.
“I therefore urge you to refer yourself to the independent adviser on the Scottish ministerial code in relation to your handling of the correction of the record in parliamentary proceedings.”
Cole-Hamilton also reminded the First Minister that ministers found to have knowingly misled Parliament are expected to resign from office.
READ MORE: Scotland has chance to right wrongs that began with Thatcher
A spokesman for the First Minister told journalists on Thursday that the cover-up claims are untrue.
He said: “The fact that we corrected the record speaks for itself and the fact that we disclosed under FOI the discussions that took place in terms of civil servants surely also speaks for transparency.
“I saw a quote from somebody, it was the accusation of a cover-up, well we published the discussion and the only reason, as often is the case when we get stories put to us, the only reason people know about these things is because something was disclosed on the FOI.
“I’m saying we can’t be accused of covering things up and also disclosing things.”
Yousaf was also quizzed on the issue by Kerr at Thursday’s FMQs, but said “it’s incredible that I have a member who is telling me what I was meaning to say, and meaning to think”.
Kerr said: “Faced with the evidence at FMQs today, he resorted to a quite disgraceful display of deflection and insults, rather than admit he has been rumbled twice. This kind of behaviour is unworthy of his office. He should now refer himself to the independent advisory on the ministerial code for misleading Parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel