AN admission fee at a popular Scottish tourist site has been proposed amid a rise in the number of visitors.
The Calanais Standing Stones in Lewis date back 5000 years and Scotland’s heritage agency is now considering introducing an entry fee, according to a report in The Guardian.
Historic Environment Scotland (HES) said it would soon be asking Scottish Government ministers to approve the proposals.
READ MORE: See the SNP's key independence motion ahead of conference
The rise in the number of visitors has largely been driven by day trips by cruise ship passengers.
Ian Fordham, the chair of Urras nan Tursachan (UnT), which owns the Calanais visitor centre and backs the fee proposal, said there was an urgent need to tackle the impact of increasing visitor numbers.
He said around 120,000 visit the site every year and that the figure was expected to double by 2035.
The site is braced for an increase in day-trippers after a new deep water port for large cruise ships opens in Stornoway next year.
UnT and HES, which owns the standing stones, plan to build a larger visitor centre and fence in the site to make it a “single coherent visitor destination” with an entrance fee.
Fordham said: “With increasing footfall at the stones, there’s increasing risk of conservation damage, conservation risk to the stones.
“It has become clear this year that the increased visitor numbers are causing conservation issues at the stones, (in terms of) erosion.”
He said problems at the Ring of Brodgar in Orkney, which had to be closed to build new paths, was a warning of what could happen at Calanais.
Malcolm McLean, a former chair of the UN-linked cultural body Unesco Scotland, said he was “acutely aware” of the need to safeguard the sites but that an entrance fee could dismay locals.
READ MORE: ScotRail criticised over extra train for Disney Cruise tourists
“It will be a highly controversial decision on the island”, he told The Guardian. “From a community perspective, people see this as a place that’s open and they can come and go at any time.”
The admission fee proposal was approved by HES’s board earlier this year and board members said they felt it could set a precedent for other sites – an indication that charging could be imposed on other attractions.
The board said: “Careful consideration is required over how the local community is engaged in this process.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel