SNP members are set to vote on a potential new policy that could see talks on leaving the UK start if the party wins a majority of Scottish seats at the next General Election.
A motion from SNP leader and Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf and Westminster leader Stephen Flynn in support of that is to be debated at the party’s conference next month.
Essentially the announcement made by Yousaf at the party's Independence Convention this summer, it makes clear that as the UK Government has continued to “unjustly block a democratic referendum” the next Westminster general election – expected to take place some time in 2024 – could be a “means to offer that opportunity”.
The SNP manifesto for that election should “state on page one, line one” that a vote for the party is a vote for “Scotland to become an independent country”.
READ MORE: Labour majority at risk as support drifts back to SNP, poll finds
The motion then goes on to add that “if the SNP subsequently wins the most seats at the General Election in Scotland, the Scottish Government is empowered to begin immediate negotiations with the UK Government to give democratic effect to Scotland becoming an independent country”.
It comes after successive Conservative prime ministers have rejected calls from the Scottish Government for another vote on the country’s place in the UK.
The UK Supreme Court has already ruled that the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to organise its own ballot on the issue.
Reaction to the motion has so far seen Scottish LibDem chief Alex Cole-Hamilton describe it as a "crackpot" plan, and Alba chief Alex Salmond warn it's "not at all credible".
We want to hear what our readers think, so using the box below let us know how you feel about the plan. Remember, many of these responses will be published.
Have your say on the SNP conference independence motion
The SNP have set out their central motion on independence for this autumn's party conference. Signed by Humza Yousaf and seconded by Stephen Flynn, the motion states that negotiations for independence are to take place if the SNP win the most seats, rather than votes, in Scotland at the next General Election. We want to hear your views - is the motion the right approach for the election? Would you prefer a de facto referendum vote? What would you change? Let us know here as we look to put together a story on our readers' reactions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel