HALF of Edinburgh Council’s Labour administration are facing investigations for breaches of code of conduct after a “rule-breaking” party in the City Chambers.
Council leader Cammy Day apologised after the event came to light, when newly-selected Westminster candidates posted pictures online of a "thank-you’ gathering attended by at least five other administration councillors and party activists.
The event was held in the Labour group’s offices, and the posts were quickly deleted. However, it sparked accusations that it breached “strict rules against using taxpayer-funded council facilities for party political campaigning”.
READ MORE: Labour majority at risk as support drifts back to SNP, poll finds
Day’s apology came following pressure from Kevin Lang, the LibDem group leader, as the Labour administration risked losing support of the party to remain in power due to the blunder.
Lang welcomed the response but said it “should never have taken five days for him to respond and acknowledge the mistakes made”.
And now, six councillors - half of the ruling group of 12 members - are set to face standards investigations after it emerged that councillor Scott Arthur, transport and environment convener, was also in attendance.
Planning convener James Dalgleish, culture and communities convener Val Walker and integration joint board chair Tim Pogson had previously been named as attending.
Katrina Faccenda, the only other councillor to respond so far, confirmed to the Local Democracy Reporting Service she would also be reporting herself to the Commissioner.
“I was invited to drinks where the two candidates were present. As a new councillor I assumed this was ok to have a gathering of LP members similar to the Christmas parties all groups hold,” she wrote on X/Twitter.
The event was hosted by Chris Murray, Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Westminster candidate, and Tracy Gilbert, candidate for Edinburgh North and Leith.
Gilbert hailed the event as a “fantastic” night with “so much optimism” in a post on X/Twitter, before swiftly deleting it due to the backlash.
READ MORE: See the SNP's key independence motion ahead of conference
The photographs showed around 40 attendees holding Labour election posters.
A separate post by Allan McDougall, which has also since been deleted, showed Day, Murray and Gilbert in front of party posters stuck to furniture and an audience in Labour’s City Chamber’s office.
The code of conduct prohibits the use of council resources “without thinking about the implications or consequences, unlawfully, for any party political or campaigning activities or matters relating to these or improperly”.
If a breach is found to have occurred, members can be censured, suspended and even barred from sitting.
The incident has caused a rift between the Labour administration and its 13 LibDem colleagues, with Lang insisting that the councillors and the event should be “investigated fully”.
“It is now important for this independent process to be allowed to run its course,” he said.
“The council as a whole will then need to consider the Commission’s decision and any sanction it chooses to impose.”
After details of the event emerged, Andrew Kerr, the local authority’s chief executive, wrote to councillors reminding them of “your own responsibilities under the Code of Conduct, with respect to the use of council resources”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel