HUMZA Yousaf has said he is “confident” that SNP members will back his motion on independence strategy ahead of the next General Election.
On Thursday, the details of the First Minister’s motion, backed by SNP Westminster Stephen Flynn were revealed, stating that negotiations for independence will take place if the party wins the most seats, rather than votes.
It also outlines a number of next steps, such as a draft legal text on the transfer of powers from Westminster to the Scottish Parliament and publication of a Withdrawal from Westminster document.
READ MORE: See the SNP's key independence motion ahead of party's conference
It comes as some in the party, such as the party’s longest standing MP Pete Wishart, argued that the strategy should be focusing on the securing more than 50% of the vote.
The motion is essentially what the First Minister set out in Dundee at the party’s independence convention earlier this year. He previously said he had wanted to wait for the party’s regional assemblies to finish before putting forward any motion.
Speaking to journalists at a visit to a nursery in Rutherglen, The National asked the FM why there had been no material changes to the plan, despite input from members across the country.
NEW: The SNP held regional assemblies over summer to help determine their independence strategy - but the party's strategy is largely the same as it was before these events. We asked Humza Yousaf why pic.twitter.com/QiiZwHMtWw
— The National (@ScotNational) September 15, 2023
He said: “The regional assemblies that I went to and I spoke to every regional rep as well, it seemed to me that there was a lot of satisfaction about the route that I had proposed so that’s why I’ve included some of their feedback within the regional assemblies.
“But there are people who believe in, for example, the def acto route, Pete Wishart is probably one of them, so let's have that debate.
“I'm pretty confident in the argument that I’m proposing.”
“But in the best traditions in the SNP and I’ve been involved in many conferences where we’ve had a great debate, pretty robust, and we’ve come together to back whatever it is conference decides.
“I’m quite confident that conference will back my proposition but I look forward to a healthy debate.”
Asked if he was preparing for eventualities such as a low voter turnout at the General Election, Yousaf said: “Look I’m in control of what we can do in the SNP and what we can do in the SNP is make sure there’s a high voter turnout, of course the Conservatives have done their best to depress voter turnout with Voter ID but we’ll do our best to try and make sure there’s a good voter turnout.
READ MORE: Labour condemned by minister for backing Tory short-term lets delay
“I’m not complacent.
“This is going to be a tough General Election, we know Labour are biting at our heels.”
Yousaf pointed to the “encouraging” YouGov poll published on Thursday showing support drifting away from Labour and back to the SNP, but caveated it was “only one poll”.
“So we’re not complacent at all about the threat that other parties pose,” he added.
“That’s why we’ll be putting independence front and centre and my belief is it’s absolutely the alternative that people are crying out for.
“Labour, Sir Keir Starmer, with his support for Bedroom Tax, rape clause, two-child limit, Brexit, he’s not the alternative, independence is the alternative.”
Earlier, Wishart (above), MP for Perth and North Perthshire, said it would not be “credible” or “realistic” for the SNP to “try and assert some sort of move towards independence if you're not carrying the majority of people with you".
Wishart has repeatedly called for the party to pursue the de facto referendum route.
Asked for his response to the MP’s comments, Yousaf said: “Two things, first of all, remember, our Plan A remains, of course, to test the proposition for popular support. Not me, not Pete Wishart, nobody in the SNP is rejecting that, nobody in the SNP is blocking that from happening. It's the Westminster parties.
READ MORE: Independence supporters react to SNP's conference motion
“So we have to accept that they're not going to allow us to test that proposition for popular support.
“I believe you have to use the next electoral means to do that, the next election will be a means to test that proposition.
“And the way we'll test it is by the rules of a General Election, he who wins the most seats wins that General Election, that has been the case since records began.
“What I would say to Pete and others, it’s definitely worth a debate on this question, hence why we will be having that debate in the best traditions of the SNP at the SNP conference next month.”
During a visit to Scotland on Friday, shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves (above) dismissed the FM’s proposals and said Labour wouldn’t consider it a mandate.
Asked by journalists what the SNP would do if Keir Starmer won’t negotiate independence if the party wins the most seats, the FM said: “That is a really a question for Sir Keir Starmer, that if we are given another mandate from the people of Scotland to put independence into democratic effect, so have a referendum, well, who's he to deny the people of Scotland?
“And my belief is that Westminster parties are denying us because they fear the verdict of the Scottish people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel