Ash Regan has warned against Humza Yousaf’s ‘most seats’ strategy to win an independence mandate.
The SNP MSP said it was “risky” and that the UK Government won’t take it seriously.
A motion from SNP leader and Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf and Westminster leader Stephen Flynn released on Thursday – that is set to be debated at the SNP conference in Aberdeen in October – says that talks on leaving the UK start if the party wins a majority of Scottish seats at the next General Election.
Regan, who ran against Yousaf and Kate Forbes in the SNP leadership election in March (below), told The Daily Record that if Westminster were to be brought to the negotiating table, a “high bar” would have to be cleared – suggesting that if an alliance of pro-independence parties achieved more than 50 per cent of the total votes cast in Scotland, a mandate would be secured.
"In my mind it needs to be that high bar, it needs to be clear what people are voting for," Regan said.
"If we did get over 50 per cent - and remember I am including more parties than just the SNP - I think, at that point, the UK Government would have to take that seriously as it would be a majority vote.
"Any party that is pro-indy and wants to join in could."
She added: "At general elections, people often have other things on their minds, particularly when Scotland is suffering with the economy and the cost of living crisis."
On the motion backed by Yousaf, she said: "I personally don't feel it would be enough of a mandate. I don't think the UK Government will take that seriously."
READ MORE: Ash Regan calls for Nicola Sturgeon to consider quitting SNP
She concluded: "Independence is not about one person, it's not about one political party. Independence is a movement of the people of Scotland.
"I think it needs to be a broad church, and we have to be careful we are not excluding people.
"Independence is just the start, so we need to take everybody with us."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel