THE president of the SNP is facing a challenge for the role from a party activist.
The Herald revealed that current president Michael Russell is being challenged by land reform campaigner and SNP member Graeme McCormick.
Internal party papers showed that McCormick has been nominated for the role ahead of the SNP’s internal elections during next month’s party conference.
Traditionally, the role of president in the SNP is an honorary one bestowed upon those who have shown distinguished service to the party. It is not an executive position.
Previously, McCormick had stated his intention to stand for the role but then pulled out claiming he had entered it inadvertently.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens MSP 'corrects' reporter twice during BBC interview
“I don’t know how it happened,” he said.
“If I completed the form inaccurately, then I may well have inadvertently ticked the box [for President] and as soon as it was brought to my notice I withdrew my name from the contest.”
However, Russell told The Herald that he was looking forward to the challenge.
“I think Graeme McCormick stood [in 2021] and then withdrew his nomination.
“It is entirely up to him and I look forward to the challenge. I will be happy for members to choose who they wish to carry on the work which I've been doing.
"I've been busy over the last year. I had to take on the role of acting chief executive and I am co-chairing the constitution and governance review."
READ MORE: Glasgow parents join campaigners to back LEZ and slam 'toxic' air
Russell became president of the SNP in 2020, beating bids from former ambassador Craig Murray and ex-MP Corri Wilson – both of whom are now supporters of the Alba Party.
He has continued in the role ever since and is now jointly heading the party’s governance review following Nicola Sturgeon’s resignation.
McCormick said he would make a statement regarding the challenge once the SNP published its final agenda for the party conference.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel