APPLICATIONS will be made for drug testing facilities in three Scottish cities, drugs policy minister Elena Whitham has said.
The Scottish Government minister added the plans for Aberdeen, Glasgow and Dundee are awaiting “final communications” from the Home Office.
MSPs also backed a motion calling for an urgent review of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, adopting a “public health response” which decriminalises drugs for personal use. Whitham’s motion passed by 66 votes to 45.
A Conservative amendment opposed decriminalisation and said the problem should be tackled through the proposed Right to Recovery Bill. This was defeated with 28 votes in favour and 66 against.
A Labour amendment noted that “no formal application has been made to establish drug checking services in Scotland and medication assisted treatment standards are yet to be fully implemented”. This was defeated with 21 votes in favour and 90 against.
READ MORE: Scottish Government backs decriminalisation of personal drug use
It comes as the proposed pilot of a safe consumption room for drugs moves closer.
Scotland’s Lord Advocate has said it “would not be in the public interest” to prosecute users of such a facility for drugs possession while the Home Office has confirmed it will not intervene on any plans.
Whitham took part in the debate via video link as she was ill with Covid. She told MSPs: “This Government is clear, the war on drugs is over.
“No-one won and the main casualties were not organised criminals. They were the poorest and most vulnerable people in our society who need our help, not driven further into the margins.”
Whitham was asked about the Government’s plans for drugs checking services, which aim to reduce harm by testing illegal substances and potentially reducing overdoses.
Work on pilots for these facilities has been undertaken involving Stirling University, with Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee identified as potential areas.
She said: “We are now moving to the phase of helping those areas to apply for licences.
“We are awaiting final communications from the UK Home Office that will help us to make sure those licence applications can go and be met with the most sympathetic ear possible.”
The minister said she would update Holyrood on the plans.
READ MORE: SNP meeting to discuss Fergus Ewing disciplinary action postponed
Whitham also used her motion to call for an urgent review of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 to include decriminalising drugs for personal use, adding that the Scottish Government should work constructively with the UK Government to either amend it or seek to devolve the powers to Scotland to draft its own drugs legislation.
She said: "There is clear evidence to show that much more could be achieved if we had the power to fully implement the public health approach we’re committed to.”
The motion passed by 66 votes to 45.
The Tories’ Sue Webber said during the debate that drugs deaths have “spiralled out of control” under the SNP.
She said her party did not oppose plans for the pilot of a safe consumption room but did not support the SNP’s position of decriminalising drugs.
Webber said: “Decriminalising class A drugs will not help tackle Scotland’s drug death crisis and could make it more difficult for the police to tackle the criminal gangs that profit from this trade and cause misery for our communities across Scotland.”
Labour’s Jackie Baillie (above) said safe consumption rooms were first proposed six or seven years ago, yet no progress has been made in this time.
She said: “Clearly nothing has been done for six to seven years.
“I appreciate the current Lord Advocate’s position.
“But it’s the same Scottish Government, the same policy for a safe consumption room, and that policy has simply not been delivered before.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel