THE boss of GB News has insisted that an “interview” of Home Secretary Suella Braverman by her Conservative colleague Lee Anderson will be “duly impartial” as Ofcom has said there is no rule to stop the interview.
Angelos Frangopoulos defended the broadcaster’s practice of getting Conservative MPs who are being paid to host shows to have discussions with their colleagues in government.
With four serving Tory MPs on its bankroll, GB News has been coming under increasing scrutiny from Ofcom over the practice, and has once been found to have breached the rules.
The regulator is also investigating the channel over Laurence Fox’s comments about a female journalist, which have widely been condemned as misogynistic.
READ MORE: Laurence Fox: Ava Evans says comments made her feel 'physically sick'
Frangopoulos insisted the MPs’ work is “absolutely permitted under the Ofcom rules”, arguing that none of them host “a news bulletin-based programme”.
Exclusive Scoop.
— Lee Anderson MP (@LeeAndersonMP_) September 28, 2023
Watch me tomorrow on @GBNEWS interview @SuellaBraverman in her first interview on British soil since her landmark speech this week in the US.
7pm tomorrow night 🖥📺 pic.twitter.com/rvtIBeUySD
“If that changes in the future then obviously we’ll look at it,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
Pressed on why they decided not to get an impartial journalist to interview the minister, he said that they are “filling a gap in the landscape”.
“We’re not journalism for journalists, we’re journalism for people,” he said.
“The conversation that happened between people like Suella Braverman and Lee Anderson, they are conversations, they are not interviews in the same sense.”
Anderson gets £100,000 a year for his show on top of his £86,584 MP’s salary, and he also serves as the Conservative Party’s deputy chairman.
READ MORE: Lee Anderson found in breach of MPs' code of conduct for GB News promo
He billed their discussion that will be aired on Lee Anderson’s Real World on Friday evening as an “exclusive scoop”, and as the “first interview on British soil since her landmark speech this week in the US”.
The under-fire GB News boss said: “We are confident that that programme will be fully compliant.
“We follow the rules very closely and it will be duly impartial on the platform that it airs.”
Ofcom chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes has said that the interview could comply with its rules as long as the “overall show … preserves due impartiality”.
She added she did not want to pre-judge the interview because the media regulator was “not a censor”. She said Ofcom defended “freedom of expression” but would consider any complaints recieved about the programme after it aired on Friday evening.
Earlier this month, Ofcom found that an interview with Chancellor Jeremy Hunt carried out by married Tory MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies broke due impartiality rules.
READ MORE: Westminster's insidious attempt to wipe out Scotland
The regulator said it had “failed to represent and give due weight to an appropriately wide range of significant views on a matter of major political controversy”.
Frangopoulos defended the interview, saying that the Tory MPs, seen as being on the right of the party, were interviewing a Chancellor he described as “centrist”.
The BBC’s veteran journalist Nick Robinson suggested that approach to impartiality could be considered “GB Newspeak”, in the vein of the euphemistic and propagandistic language characterised in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.
“I disagree,” Frangopoulos said.
“What you’re looking at here is just a different way of carrying out discussions and extracting information out of a process that really has been locked up, where it has been journalists speaking along the same lines all the time and extracting the same information.”
Tory MP Caroline Nokes has criticised her colleagues who are “swanning off” to present television shows while they have got a “day job to do”.
But Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has praised Anderson as doing a “fantastic job” for his constituents in Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, and gave him “total support”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel