BOTH of the losing candidates in the SNP’s 2023 leadership race voted against the suspension of rebel MSP Fergus Ewing from the party, according to reports.
Kate Forbes and Ash Regan were both among the MSPs who voted against a one-week suspension for Ewing, which was approved by the Holyrood group at an internal meeting on Wednesday evening.
The Herald reported that a further six MSPs – excluding Ewing himself – voted against his suspension.
These were his sister Annabelle Ewing, Christine Grahame, Michelle Thomson, Kenneth Gibson, Colin Beattie, and Jim Fairlie.
A further four MSPs – Ivan McKee, Ruth Maguire, Ben Macpherson and Stephanie Callaghan – abstained from the vote.
READ MORE: 'Whatever I say will be what Anas Sarwar says', Keir Starmer tells Scottish media
The vast majority of the SNP Holyrood group, some 48 MSPs, backed the one-week suspension.
Ewing, a former Cabinet secretary and the son of SNP trailblazer Winnie Ewing, has been growing increasingly vocal in his attacks on the party in recent months.
He has called the SNP’s partners in the Bute House governing agreement, the Scottish Greens, “wine bar revolutionaries” and branded their policies “extremist”. He voted with the Conservatives in a no-confidence motion against Green minister Lorna Slater in June.
Ewing has also claimed that electing Humza Yousaf as its new leader, and not Kate Forbes, was the biggest mistake the SNP have ever made.
The MSP also declined to say if he would rejoin the SNP group once his suspension ends.
Western Isles MP Angus MacNeil (above) was also suspended from the SNP for one week after a public clash with then-chief whip Brendan O’Hara. However, when his suspension ended, MacNeil declined to rejoin the party, leading ultimately to his expulsion.
Asked if he would rejoin, Ewing told journalists: “I have been suspended for a week, that was the decision of the group.
“I will have to consider that and decide what to do.
“I haven’t begun to do that yet because I’ve been focusing on speaking out in my constituents’ interests.”
Ewing launched a further scathing attack on the SNP in a statement he gave following his suspension.
READ MORE: One taken to hospital and nearly 50 ‘assessed’ after school bus crash
He said in a pre-prepared statement: “I bit my tongue when I didn’t agree with certain policies the party was promoting. I did so because I thought fundamentally that the party that has been such a big party of my life was fundamentally proceeding in the right way for Scotland – standing up for Scotland.
“The SNP are not an ordinary party – we are a party that has always put Scotland first, and that means to me, putting the interests of the people of Scotland first.
“But in good conscience, and it grieves me to say this, I don’t believe that is any longer the case.”
Net Zero Secretary Mairi McAllan previously defended Ewing’s suspension as proportionate, telling the BBC: “In full transparency, yes I did [vote to suspend Ewing].
“It is something I certainly would expect to be the outcome if I had done what Fergus did.
“It is part of a normal party mechanism in a democratic system.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel