AN SNP backbencher has said a “fresh look” should be taken at her party’s agreement with the Greens, in the wake of the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election.
Michelle Thomson said the SNP needs to improve its messaging and questioned whether the agreement with the smaller pro-independence party was popular.
Humza Yousaf has promised the SNP will “reflect, regroup and reorganise” following the defeat, which saw Labour’s Michael Shanks win on a swing of 20.4%.
Thomson, MSP for Falkirk East, was campaign manager for Yousaf’s rival Kate Forbes in the leadership contest earlier this year.
READ MORE: Andrew Tickell: 2017 General Election sheds light on by-election
Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday Show, she said Yousaf should “absolutely” remain the leader.
She added: “I do make the proviso, and I’ve said that before, that we need to look at our policies, we need to look at the proposition and we need to look at the messaging.
“We need to be speaking for the people of Scotland. We’ve got more work to do to acknowledge the result in the by-election.”
The Bute House Agreement signed after the last Scottish Parliament election brought the Greens into government for the first time, gaining two ministers in a co-operation deal with the SNP.
Asked if the SNP should drop this, Thomson said: “I would hope as part of the review that a fresh look is made at the arrangement with the Greens, I’m not sure how popular it is.
“But remember I’m only here as a backbencher, it is not my say so, it is Humza Yousaf’s.”
Ahead of the SNP conference later this month, Thomson said there should be a renewed focus on the cost-of-living crisis.
Her comments were seized upon by the Scottish Conservatives, who said the power-sharing agreement should be scrapped.
Party chairman Craig Hoy said: “Michelle Thomson is just the latest senior SNP figure to call for Humza Yousaf to think again about his toxic and destructive partnership with the extremist Greens.
“She, like the country, can see the deeply damaging influence Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater are having on Scotland.
“On a host of policies – including vital road upgrades, the future of oil and gas, crippling fishing restrictions, gender self-ID and the bungled deposit return scheme – the Greens are either pulling the SNP in the wrong direction or out of their depth.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel