THE SNP would lead Labour by just two percentage points at a General Election, a new poll has suggested.
The YouGov survey, carried out on behalf of the Labour-affiliated Scottish Fabians, found that 33% of voters said they would vote SNP in the next Westminster election, while 31% said they would vote Labour.
In total, 20% of people said they would vote Conservative while the Scottish Greens were on 6% and the LibDems on 4%.
With Don’t Knows removed, the gap between the SNP and Labour narrowed to a single percentage point.
Analysis suggested that 33% of voters would back the SNP, 32% Labour, 20% the Tories, and 5% would back both the Greens and the LibDems.
READ MORE: Alister Jack attacked for 'misunderstanding' invite after second Holyrood DRS snub
Based on a sample size of 1003 adults, the analysis also suggested that support for Labour in Scotland includes around 17% of people who voted for the SNP at the 2019 General Election.
The results are very different to those from a YouGov poll conducted in September, which found the SNP had an 11-point lead over Labour (38% vs 27%).
Scottish Fabians previously calculated that Labour need the backing of one in five of those who voted SNP or Green in 2019 to win 25 targets seats across Scotland and form a majority government.
The targeted seats are all currently held by the SNP – apart from Rutherglen and Hamilton West, which Labour won in a by-election to replace previous MP Margaret Ferrier last week.
Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice (above) has said that for every 12 seats Labour win in Scotland, it takes two points off the swing needed in the rest of the UK.
Winning most or all of these Scottish target seats is crucial for Labour, as it makes the path to power in Westminster much easier, the Fabians said.
Labour had far fewer respondents who said they would never consider voting for the party (28%), compared with 45% who said the same about the SNP and 61% who said they would never consider voting for the Conservatives.
Katherine Sangster, national director of the Scottish Fabians, said: “Following the victory in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election, this research shows Labour is well positioned to win target seats across Scotland at the next election.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf brands Tory attacks on SNP-Green deal over Israel war 'crass'
“Labour is making significant progress in rebuilding the ‘first red wall’, with key voter groups either intending to vote Labour or open to doing so – and they want a majority Labour government after the next election.
“There remains more to do for Labour to convert support into votes at the ballot box, and there is an obvious group to persuade: those who prefer a majority Labour government but aren’t yet backing the party.
“However, the evidence is clear – Labour is on the right track towards winning seats across Scotland and forming a majority government whenever the next election is called.”
Further analysis showed 21% of SNP voters in the last general election and 18% of independence voters at the 2014 referendum said a Labour majority government was their preferred outcome at the next election.
Overall, a Labour majority UK government emerged as the most popular outcome in Scotland.
Eighteen per cent of voters said they would back a majority Conservative government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel