SEAN Hogg, who was found guilty in April of raping a 13-year-old girl when he was 17, has had his conviction quashed.
The 22-year-old was convicted of attacking the schoolgirl twice in Dalkeith Country Park in 2018.
He was spared jail by Judge Lord Lake at the High Court in Glasgow in April and was instead given 270 hours of unpaid work, although he said if Hogg was over 25, he would have been sentenced to four or five years behind bars.
The decision not to jail Hogg attracted criticism from Rape Crisis Scotland and other groups.
Hogg - who had been added to the sex offenders' register and put under supervision following his conviction - claimed he was wrongfully convicted of the attacks.
Judges at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh have now quashed his conviction after prosecutors admitted “mistakes were made” during his trial.
Hogg's lawyers argued that Lord Lake had misdirected the jury.
At the hearing, the Crown Office accepted this and that part of the verdict should be quashed.
READ MORE: DLC breach planning rules at Taymouth Castle, satellite images reveal
Judge Lady Dorrian said: “There was an insufficiency of evidence for conviction.
“The appeal must succeed.”
After Hogg - from Hamilton in South Lanarkshire - won his appeal, prosecutors decided it was not in the public interest to seek a retrial.
However, they argued that the jury still had enough evidence for Hogg to be convicted of raping the girl on a single occasion.
The Crown Office had planned to challenge the “unduly lenient” sentence, if the appeal against conviction had not succeeded.
In a previous hearing, both the advocate depute and the trial judge were identified as having failed to push for more detail or issue adequate directions to the jury.
Donald Findlay KC, representing Hogg, told that hearing: “There has been a miscarriage of justice.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here