THROUGHOUT the independence strategy debate at SNP conference on Sunday afternoon, we heard plenty of terminology about routes. Roads, journeys, no shortcuts, road blocks, hurdles.
If they had not realised it already, delegates were told under no uncertain terms that this is a party at a crossroads and it needed guidance about the way ahead from its members.
There was an admission from policy chief Toni Giugliano early on that SNP voters did not come out in Rutherglen and Hamilton West earlier this month, allowing Labour an easy ride to victory in the by-election.
The frustration around that and the downward trajectory the party appears to be on was no more apparent than in the raised voice of MP Tommy Sheppard who bellowed that, in his view, the SNP simply cannot afford to lose the next General Election if independence is to be achieved. The journey will end, he said, if this happens.
But while he pleaded with members to stick with the party and believe in its cause, he was honest about the need to make it clear to people that independence will not be for independence’s sake, but to gain the powers Scotland needs to solve many of its economic problems.
READ MORE: SNP conference: Nadia El-Nakla tells of 'despair' in emotional speech on Gaza
And that was the mood of the whole affair, really. A party that needed to remember its core beliefs, but also a party that needed to look inside itself and reassess how it communicates that belief and the reasons for it to the only people that can make the dream come true.
In the end, delegates opted to back a strategy based on the party winning a majority of seats at the next General Election. If that happens, the Scottish Government will be “empowered to begin immediate negotiations with the UK Government to give democratic effect to Scotland becoming an independent country”.
🚨 Our political reporter @BrawnJourno was in the room for the independence strategy debate this afternoon, this is how she found it… pic.twitter.com/4ArIAiXqMK
— The National (@ScotNational) October 15, 2023
The debate overran with a stream of speakers keen to make their voices heard on the issue, and for a while delegates listened intently - taking notes, whispering to each other and shaking and nodding their heads at the ideas on the table.
As time ticked on, though, it started to feel as if this was a bit like the process you go through when you’re ordering a takeaway. It felt like people had decided what they wanted but still fancied one last look at the menu available, before going back to what they thought about in the first place.
Delegates did get twitchy in their seats and clearly wanted to quit talking process and get on with the job.
There were some who clearly walked away unsatisfied, still feeling as if the party did not believe in itself and lacked ambition as the possibility of reaching 50+1% of the overall vote was firmly batted away.
They will not stay quiet. Passionate speeches from the likes of Chris Hanlon and Pete Wishart calling for a “credible and realistic” route to independence that would be recognised internationally – which they argued could only be done through votes, not seats – received smatterings of claps and definitely sparked conversation.
But despite how split it might seem the SNP have been in recent months, delegates appeared to come together and settle on a way forward.
Famed inventor Charles Kettering once said "a problem well stated is a problem half solved". The SNP have reminded themselves of their direction, but only time will tell if they have been honest enough with themselves about what must be done to get there.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel