BBC News issued an apology after a presenter described people taking part in marches in support of Palestine as backing Hamas.
Thousands of people across the UK marched in solidarity with Palestine, calling for an end to the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.
The broadcaster had previously spoken of “several demonstrations” in which people “voiced their backing for Hamas”.
Later, a statement on Twitter/X from presenter Maryam Moshiri said: “Earlier we reported on some of the pro-Palestinian demonstrations at the weekend.
BBC News apologizes for describing UK's pro-Palestine rallies as pro-Hamas.#israel #gaza #war #genocide https://t.co/48HUqkiw3P pic.twitter.com/GQVtJwl0ed
— MG (@arnau1700) October 16, 2023
“We spoke about ‘several demonstrations across Britain during which people voiced their backing for Hamas’.
“We accept this was poorly phrased and was a misleading description of the demonstrations.”
Many had taken to social media to criticise the BBC for its reporting with Novara Media founder Aaron Bastani saying: “Utterly appalling from the BBC. That means 150,000 in London breached the 2000 Terrorism Act on Sat – who is writing this stuff?”
Journalist Sarah Woolley meanwhile commented: “Accurate reporting matters.”
In a statement, the BBC said: “Careful consideration has been given to all aspects of our coverage to ensure we report on developments accurately and with due impartiality in line with due impartiality in line with BBC editorial guidelines, which are publicly available.
“We understand this is an extremely worrying time for people not only in the region, but also in the UK and around the world and we have reflected this in our coverage.
READ MORE: BBC to admit error after 'SNP embroiled in ongoing court case' claim
“BBC News has provided our global audiences with coverage and first-hand testimony of the atrocities committed by Hamas and the suffering in Gaza.
“We have made clear the devastating human cost to civilians living in Israel and Gaza and the unprecedented nature of what has happened.
“The huge loss of civilian life on both sides makes this a shocking and difficult story to cover.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel