SNP delegates have voted on and passed a resolution to “reaffirm” the party commitment of fully dualling the A9 and A96 at their annual conference.
The motion, moved by councillor Jérémie Fernandes, who brought with him a copy of the SNP’s 1990 agenda featuring a commitment to dual the road fully.
Fernandes from the party’s Elgin branch stated the party should be “proud” of having that in their manifesto in the early nineties, before either the Tories or Labour had focused on the road, however he added that now SNP were the governing party, they should “get on with it”.
The full motion passed by the party states: “Conference asserts that the full dualling of the A9 and A96, with the implementation of modern safety standards, such as separated carriageways, improved junctions, enhanced signage, and state of the art Traffic Management systems, will create safer road environments that minimise the likelihood of accidents, reduce injury, and ultimately save lives.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf to unveil NHS funding boost in conference speech
“Conference reaffirms the SNP's unwavering commitment to fully dualling the A9 and A96 as a top infrastructure priority for Scotland. Conference further reaffirms the SNP's determination to allocate the necessary resources and expertise to expedite the planning, development, and construction of these road projects, and the party's commitment to working collaboratively with local authorities, communities, and other stakeholders to achieve these objectives.”
He said the number one issue when knocking doors for activists in the northeast, the number one issue is the two roads’ safety.
The motion was seconded by David Birckett from Peterhead, saying he could not overstate the “benefits”. He added the project had become “a bit of a political football” and said, “we have given [opposition] too much possession in this game.”
He said: “Many UK governments have let down the northeast and Moray, and we have an opportunity today to make sure that our SNP-led Scottish Government doesn’t join that long and undistinguished list of let-down governments. We avoid that fate very simply; we avoid it by keeping our promises.”
READ MORE: LIVE: All the updates from SNP conference day three
Councillor Gwyneth Petrie, Emma Roddick MSP and Pete Wishart MP also spoke in favour of the motion.
Rhodri Griffiths, an SNP member for three years originally from Wales, spoke against the motion.
He stated: “This is road building, it’s a way of problem-solving that belongs to the past – to the 1950s and 1960s. We just look around this area, and we see the amount of tarmac and concrete there is. This is not the approach we should be taking now.
“We should be looking at a greener, more environmentally friendly approach. The answer to connectivity – and I was very impressed with Tracey from Dumfries yesterday – if we want to improve connectivity, we really should be looking at the railways, this is the modern way forward.”
He also stated accidents are not to do with infrastructure but “the way that people are driving”.
Delegates voted for the resolution, which passed overwhelmingly.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel