SIR Keir Starmer denied he ever backed Israel withholding humanitarian aid from Gaza as he sought to clarify his remarks about the siege after sparking concern.
The Labour leader said that food, fuel, water and medicines must urgently be allowed to pass into the territory as he acknowledged his earlier remarks caused “distress”.
A number of his councillors have resigned over what they perceived as “horrifying” comments that he was “endorsing a war crime”.
In an interview with LBC in the wake of Hamas launching a murderous assault on Israeli civilians, Starmer appeared to suggest that Israel has “the right” to withhold energy and water from Gaza.
But after days of backlash, Starmer argued on Friday that he had intended to say that Israel has the right to defend itself and retrieve the around 200 hostages being held – “within international law”.
Speaking to broadcasters, the Labour leader said he wanted to “clarify precisely what I was saying” during the “grave and urgent” situation for more than two million Palestinians.
“I know that LBC clip has been widely shared and caused real concern and distress in some Muslim communities, so let me be clear about what I was saying and what I wasn’t saying,” he said.
“I was saying that Israel has the right to self-defence, and when I said that right I meant it was that right to self-defence. I was not saying that Israel had the right to cut off water, food, fuel or medicines.
“On the contrary. For over a week now, I have been leading the charge calling for that humanitarian aid to come in.”
READ MORE: Sam Heughan releases statement after 'inadvertently' signing Gaza letter
Starmer has met with councillors as he works to repair the damage caused by the remarks on the politically fraught subject.
Amna Abdullatif, a councillor in Ardwick in Manchester, and Shaista Aziz and Amar Latif, of Oxford City Council, also said they would resign over the comments.
Abdullatif said Starmer had made “horrifying comments about Israel having the right to withhold fuel, water, food and electricity from the 2.2 million Palestinians trapped in Gaza, effectively endorsing a war crime”.
Protesters gathered outside the Labour headquarters in south-east London on Friday morning to demand the party change its position on the Israel-Hamas war.
Demonstrators at the protest, organised by London Palestine Action, held placards reading: “Where is your backbone?” and: “End the occupation”.
Meanwhile in Scotland a number of party officials have quit their roles amid an alleged gagging order on the issue.
Office bearers in Glasgow Kelvin quit after calling for the cessation of Israeli military action.
The nine Glasgow Kelvin officials include Jim Mackechnie, Jennifer Young, Kim Bonnar, Peter Duffy, Pauline Bryan, Vince Mills, Diarmaid Kelliher, Agnes Tolmie and David Conway.
Speaking exclusively to The National, Duffy explained that the branch had intended to debate a motion on Gaza at their monthly meeting.
But within hours of circulating the motion with members, he said he received an email from Scottish Labour saying no branches were to discuss the situation in Gaza under any circumstances.
Duffy added: “I thought that comment ‘Israel has that right’ when he was asked about Israel cutting off water was completely wrong and disgraceful, to be honest.
“I noticed various party hierarchy are now trying to walk back on that and say actually he was answering a previous question.
“Now that may or may not be true but there’s been plenty of opportunity to rectify that and I haven’t seen that."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel