CAMPAIGNER and former diplomat Craig Murray has revealed he could be facing potential criminal proceedings after he was detained under terrorism laws – and believes police may be seeking information on Wikileaks.
The former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is now a member of the Alba Party, was previously told The National how he was detained last week at Glasgow Airport and questioned by border police for an hour.
Murray said he had his phone and laptop taken from him and has now revealed that his phone has been kept by Police Scotland “as it is required for further investigation”.
It is unclear under which powers the police are retaining the phone, though the part of the Terrorism Act cited in the letter for the device being taken in the first place gives officers the powers to confiscate items which they believe “may be needed for use as evidence in criminal proceedings”.
That part of the legislation only gives police the powers to hold confiscated items for a week, according to official Home Office guidance on the Terrorism Act.
This suggests another part of the legislation is in play, however the letter does not state which.
READ MORE: Craig Murray: I was detained under terror laws after Palestine protest
Murray said his detention last week may have related to a tweet he posted expressing support for Hamas, which could be a criminal offence because the UK has designated the organisation as a proscribed terrorist organisation.
The former diplomat said he was detained at Glasgow Airport on his return from Reykjavik last Monday, where he had been meeting other members of the campaign to free Wikileaks founder Julian Assange (below).
He had also attended a march in support of Palestine after war broke out between Hamas and Israel on October 7 and has alleged the police are attempting to gather information on Wikileaks though his phone.
Assange is facing criminal charges in the US under the Espionage Act for publishing thousands of classified documents on Wikileaks between 2010 and 2011.
Murray told The National on Tuesday evening: “It seems like they are using the Palestine thing as an excuse to get information on Wikileaks.”
He said he has been offered legal support by Glasgow-based human rights lawyer Aamer Anwar and in his blog pleaded with followers to donate to help fund a bid to raise his case with the United Nations Human Rights Committee.
Murray wrote: “This is an enormous abuse of human rights. The abuse of process in refusing both a lawyer and the right to remain silent, the inquiry into perfectly legal campaigning which is in no way terrorism-associated, the political questioning, the financial snooping and the seizure of material related to my private life, were all based on an utterly fake claim that I am associated with terrorism.”
He added: “My legal team have already made a submission against this outrage to the United Nations Human Rights Committee and are looking at the possibility of judicial review in the UK.
“We also have to prepare the defence against possible terrorism charges, ludicrous as that sounds.
“I am afraid this all costs money. I am grateful for the unfailing generosity of people in what seems a continual history of persecution.”
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “We have received a number of complaints and officers are carrying out enquiries."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel