KEIR Starmer has said Labour members SHOULD be allowed to discuss the war between Israel and Hamas – despite party high command banning branches from talking about the issue.
The Labour leader is trying to quell discontent within his party, including among members of his shadow cabinet, over his stance on the conflict after he said he believed Israel had the "right" to cut off supplies to Gaza in response to attacks by Hamas.
His comments have drawn fierce criticism and prompted the resignations of some party members .
ITV reported Labour MPs had heard shadow cabinet ministers were considering resigning from the frontbench over Starmer's handling of the situation.
Starmer has attempted to backtrack and met with Labour backbenchers and members of his shadow cabinet on Wednesday in an attempt to address concerns about his response to the crisis.
The leader of the opposition has now sparked confusion after contradicting Labour’s general secretary David Evans, who issued an order banning constituency Labour parties (CLPs) from discussing the matter.
READ MORE: Outrage as Keir Starmer fails to mention Gaza ONCE at PMQs
Asked whether the Labour leader believed party members should be able to discuss the issue, Starmer’s spokesperson said: “Yes.”
When pushed on whether he therefore disagreed with Evans’s Gaza gag order, the spokesperson denied knowledge of the directive.
As general secretary, Evans is responsible for the day-to-day running of the Labour Party.
He said: “I must confess I’ve not seen that, if there was concerns about the way in which the debate is being had, but, I mean, as I say, this is clearly an issue that people have got strong views on and will want to have a discussion around.”
The spokesperson added: “These are not matters for Keir to rule on.”
Labour 'need to turn this around'
One Labour member who resigned her CLP position over the ban has called on the party to clarify its stance.
Baroness Pauline Bryan, who served as the treasurer of Glasgow Kelvin CLP, told The National: “The last word was not to discuss it, so they would need to turn that around and explain that the position is different.”
MPs unhappy with Labour’s position on the conflict met with Starmer on Wednesday.
It came immediately after a session of Prime Minister’s Questions in which the Labour leader failed to mention Gaza and focused instead on criticising Rishi Sunak’s domestic record.
Starmer’s spokesperson denied the Labour leader was worried about the possibility he could lose votes over his handling of the party’s response to the conflict.
MPs who met with Starmer on Wednesday made no comment as they left the meeting.
Labour were approached for further comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel