KEIR Starmer has reportedly failed to heal the rift within his party over the Israel-Hamas war, with several prominent frontbenchers reportedly on “resignation watch”.
The Labour leader and his deputy, Angela Rayner, had a meeting with Muslim MPs and peers straight after PMQs on Wednesday following comments from Starmer in which he appeared to suggest Israel has the right to cut off power and water to Gaza.
This led to backlash from within the Labour Party, with 15 Labour officials in Scotland resigning this week over party rules about responding to the conflict in Gaza.
Some 150 Muslim Labour councillors also wrote to Starmer and Rayner on Wednesday urging them to back an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza.
READ MORE: Labour MP admits Keir Starmer's Israel-Hamas war stance is 'infuriating' voters
A Labour MP told Politico on Wednesday that they have received 1000 emails from constituents “the majority of whom were not Muslim voters.”
Now, up to four shadow ministers are on “resignation watch”, according to The Times. These include Sarah Owen, the shadow faith minister, and Rachel Hopkins, the shadow Cabinet Office minister.
The source added that the party are battling to keep them on side. A member of Starmer’s senior team told The Times: “There’s a real concern that if we lost a shadow minister, for example, that all of the others come under real pressure.”
In a statement after the meeting the Labour leader said: “It’s clear the amount of aid and essential utilities getting into Gaza is completely insufficient to meet the humanitarian emergency on the ground.”
He added: “In the long term there can only be a political solution to this crisis which is why we need to restart the hard work of talks for a two-state solution of a viable Palestinian state alongside a safe and secure Israel.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel