THE Scottish Government has said it needs a “legal basis” to release certain WhatsApps to the Covid-19 inquiry after a row over what had been disclosed to the probe.
We told how the issue dominated FMQs after Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross accused the First Minister and officials of “secrecy” after the counsel to the inquiry stated that the Scottish Government had not handed over any messages.
Jamie Dawson KC said on Thursday morning the Scottish Government had been asked for “all communication” relating to decisions made during the pandemic, such as informal messages on WhatsApp and other text based programs.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf responds to Celtic fans' Palestine flag display
However, he said “no messages” had been disclosed.
Ross pressed on the issue at Holyrood on Thursday, but the First Minister insisted that officials did not “routinely” make decisions over WhatsApp.
And now, the Scottish Government has insisted that as Covid-19 inquiry officials asked for messages relating to a wider scope than “government decisions”, they required a legal order to release the information.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The Scottish Government was asked by the UK Covid-19 Inquiry to provide all material related to decision making.
“It is not the culture within Scottish Government to use WhatsApp for decision making – our records management policy states clearly that government decisions should be recorded in the official record.”
The spokesperson added that the UK inquiry has “that material from the official record”.
“The UK inquiry has subsequently asked for WhatsApp messages relating to logistics and day to day communication, which of course we will provide,” they added.
“However, given the level of personal information contained within, we need a legal basis to do so, for example in the form of a Section 21 order.
“The UK inquiry indicated at this morning's hearing that it will be issuing us with the requisite legal paperwork to allow us to share those messages shortly.
“The First Minister has also asked the permanent secretary to ensure that all steps are being taken within the Government to meet the inquiry’s requests and for the Solicitor General to satisfy herself that the Government has met all its legal obligations.”
READ MORE: Labour fear frontbench resignations over Keir Starmer Gaza stance
On Thursday, a number of questions were raised about whether officials utilised the disappearing message function on WhatsApp, which automatically deletes messages after 24 hours, one week or 90 days, depending on user preference.
Speaking to journalists after FMQs, Yousaf would not say if that was the case, but added: “We don’t routinely conduct parliamentary business through WhatsApp.”
The Information Commissioner’s Office confirmed that ministers deleting the WhatsApp messages could be deemed a criminal offence if they were trying to prevent that information from being disclosed through a freedom of information request.
The First Minister said he has ordered Solicitor General Ruth Charteris to investigate the matter.
He said he is “seeking assurances” that “do not destroy” notices issued by the inquiry had been “fully complied with, not just by ministers but by every relevant Scottish Government official”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel