AN audience member tore into a Tory minister over his stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict on Question Time, calling the Government’s language towards Palestine “passive” and “disgusting”.
Junior minister Lee Rowley was taken to task on the BBC politics programme on Thursday as a woman laid into the lack of condemnation from the Tories over the killing of civilians in Gaza.
Despite dozens of MPs across the House of Commons calling for a ceasefire, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has stopped short of calling for one this week, instead insisting on humanitarian pauses in the war to allow more aid into Gaza.
Labour leader Keir Starmer has adopted the same position and has subsequently seen several of his councillors resign over his refusal to call for a ceasefire.
Rowley, minister for local government and building safety, suggested a ceasefire would only help Hamas in the conflict, which he claimed was using Palestinian people as “humanitarian shields”.
READ MORE: Owen Jones: We owe Humza Yousaf gratitude for his stance on Palestine
To rapturous applause in Bradford, the audience member said: “I think the really passive language being used by the Government is quite disgusting.
“This isn’t a humanitarian crisis, this isn’t something passive, this is a brutal bombardment of a civilian population that is half children.
“Everyone is condemning the attacks Hamas conducted - no one in their right mind would say that was okay - but when do we start condemning the murder of children from the sky? When do we start condemning bombing mosques and churches and apartment buildings?”
Rowley responded: “Who do we make a ceasefire with? This is a terrorist organisation which has executed babies, uploaded murders to Facebook. Hamas is an organisation that needs to be taken out of the Palestinian area.”
The woman interrupted Rowley asking: “How many Palestinian lives have to be killed?”
Rowley then insisted there was “no way” the Government could negotiate with Hamas which “had to be removed” for a peaceful Middle East.
The woman then asked him whether an Israeli life was worth more than a Palestinian life.
She said: “But it’s not Hamas being killed, it’s not Hamas we’re seeing blown to bits on social media, is it? We’re seeing children, women, old people, the men as well, poor fathers with their children in bags.
“What’s the exchange rate for an Israeli life to a Palestinian life? What does the death toll have to get to before this ledger becomes equal? What is it?”
Tonight’s question time is all about both Labour and the Tories being absolutely in the headlights when faced with an ordinary sense of justice light years ahead of anything either party is able to comprehend pic.twitter.com/j3r7dfu3ct
— Steven Methven (@StevenJMethven) October 26, 2023
The debate over the conflict and how the UK should be responding to it took up half the programme as emotions remained high right across the audience.
Another man argued that “two wrongs don’t make a right”, as he condemned Hamas but insisted the organisation’s actions do not give Israel the right to break international law.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens leaders 'frustrated' by council tax freeze
He said directly to Rowley: “I completely disagree with this kind of rhetoric the Conservative government is coming out with because you’re almost justifying, just because Hamas did something wrong, you’re giving Israel the green light to commit wrong.”
He then ripped into Labour’s position on the matter - directing his thoughts at shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds – while labelling Starmer as “Mr Flip-Flop” after he appeared to backtrack over his previous claims that Israel had the right to withhold power and water from Gaza this week.
The audience member went on: “The Labour Party’s position on this has been absolutely appalling. Keir Starmer, on LBC, clearly said that they have the right to stop water, electricity and aid, and all of a sudden he backtracks a week later. Mr Flip-Flop, as always, he changes his mind, and the Labour Party in Bradford is collapsing [with] people resigning on tap.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel