LORNA Slater’s comments that independence isn’t a “red line” preventing the Scottish Greens from doing a future deal with Labour has prompted a mixed reaction.
Some commentators suggested the junior minister’s comments were taken out of context as she stated during the interview on the BBC Sunday Show that any power sharing would require points in common, which the parties currently don’t have.
Elsewhere, others criticised Slater’s remarks and said they were “damaging” to the pro-independence party.
On the second day of her party’s conference in Dunfermline, Slater was asked if the Scottish Greens would consider governing with another party, such as Anas Sarwar’s Labour, or if independence is “the red line”.
READ MORE: Tory MP suspends staffer after disturbing Jimmy Savile video revealed
“The Greens are open to conversation wherever we have points in common,” she told the broadcaster.
“I think the challenge for Labour is: What do they have in common with us? Because it’s hard to know what they stand for at the moment.”
Geissler probed a second time: “So, independence isn’t a red line?”
To which Slater said: “Absolutely not”.
The Bute House Agreement, which gives the Scottish Parliament a pro-independence majority, has a number of areas specifically excluded where the parties can disagree, and is not a formal coalition.
Slater’s comments split opinion amongst independence supporters.
Former SNP councillor Mhairi Hunter suggested there had been “mischief making” around what had been reported and discussed from the interview.
She said: “The only circumstances where Labour might need Green votes is if there is not an indy majority in parliament.
READ MORE: Sky News: Scottish Labour leader's Gaza call snubbed by frontbencher
“In those circumstances why wouldn't the Greens try and advance their policies? The real issue - and LS [Lorna Slater] suggests this later in the interview - would be actually identifying areas of common interest.
“Because Scottish Labour has opposed green policies all down the line. And of course supporting independence would also be a red line for them.”
She added that if voters expect the Greens or SNP to “sulk” if there’s a Unionist majority in Holyrood, “that won’t happen”.
However, SNP backbencher Fergus Ewing (above) took a dig at Slater while criticising remarks made by First Minister Humza Yousaf on Alba defector Ash Regan.
He wrote: “... Our FM still supports as his government minister the Green co-leader who said she would readily ditch independence for continued ministerial office - under Labour!”
National columnist Ruth Wishart said: “Supporting a Unionist party may not be a red line for Lorna Slater. It will be for every Yes voter however.”
Other independence-supporting social media users were split on the issue.
One wrote: “Plenty of genuine independence supporting greens. Lorna clearly not one of them.”
READ MORE: Tory MP Paul Bristow sacked from Government job after Gaza ceasefire call
But another user suggested that the comments had been “twisted” out of context.
They added: “That’s not true, you like many others haven’t listened to the interview properly. I was at the Edinburgh march and Lorna Slater was at the front with her banner, leading the Greens.”
Another user said: “Big call for @HumzaYousaf now. If the case for independence is to survive, he must now bin these toxic Greens and win the trust back of those, like me, who have defected in part due to this mad coalition.”
Meanwhile, one Greens supporter said: “There’s no scenario where there’s potential for any kind of Labour-Green deal where there’s also a majority of pro-independence MSPs, so of course independence wouldn’t be a red line.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel