LAWYERS were forced to read out extraordinary texts sent by Dominic Cummings as part of the UK’s Covid-19 Inquiry.
The messages sent via WhatsApp saw Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser tell the then prime minister that his Cabinet ministers were “useless f*** pigs” and criticise then-health secretary Matt Hancock as a “proven liar”.
Christian Calgie, a senior political correspondent at The Daily Express, said broadcasters were in meltdown, as counsel to the inquiry Andrew O’Connor (in the clip below) read the messages out.
Calling for a reshuffle, Cummings said in a WhatsApp message in August 2020, in full: “At the moment the bubble thinks youve taken your eye off ball, you’re happy to have useless f*** pigs in charge, and they think that a vast amount of the chaotic news on the front pages is coming from No10 when in fact it’s coming from the Cabinet who are feral – if you maintain your approach of last few months, your authority will be severely weakened and you will lose good people cos [sic] they dont want to be part of something that looks like mayhem.”
Cummings added: “I also must stress I think leaving Hancock in post is a big mistake – he is a proven liar who nobody believes or shd [sic] believe on anything, and we face going into autumn crisis with the c*** in charge of NHS still.”
Following the release of the texts, Cummings defended the comments, saying he was “reflecting a widespread view” when he used expletive-laden descriptions of Cabinet ministers.
Hugo Keith KC, lead counsel to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry asked whether he contributed to a lack of effectiveness on the part of ministers, Cummings replied: “No, I think I was reflecting a widespread view amongst competent people at the centre of power at the time about the calibre of a lot of senior people who were dealing with this crisis extremely badly.”
He conceded his language was “appalling”, but said his “judgment of a lot of senior people was widespread”.
Pressed on whether he expressed his views too trenchantly and his opinion of the Cabinet overstated the position, the former key aide said: “No, I would say, if anything, it understated the position as events showed in 2020.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel