JOHN Curtice has given his verdict on the impact of the Scottish Greens stating that independence is not a “red line” for a potential deal with Labour.
The top pollster said there could be a “potential risk” that it would turn off Yes supporters, but pointed out that the party’s support is not “as strongly pro-Yes”.
The professor of politics at Strathclyde University told The National that there is a “long way to go” until the 2026 Holyrood election, and stressed that if, hypothetically, Labour did win, they would likely run a minority government, potentially supported by Tory votes.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf blasts Keir Starmer's refusal to call for Gaza ceasefire
We told how Slater was asked on the BBC Sunday Show if the party would consider a power sharing agreement with Labour or if independence is a “red line”.
“The Greens are open to conversation wherever we have points in common,” she said.
“I think the challenge for Labour is: What do they have in common with us? Because it’s hard to know what they stand for at the moment.”
Asked if that meant independence isn’t a red line, Slater (below) added: “Absolutely not.”
Speaking to The National, Curtice gave his assessment of what impact this could have on support for the Scottish Greens.
He said: “Obviously it's a potential risk, because certainly while Green voters are not as strongly pro-Yes as SNP supporters, there is no doubt that the Greens are picking up a fair number of people who vote for the SNP, and those who vote [for the SNP] on first vote are Yes supporters.
“So yeah, there's an obvious potential risk.”
Curtice added: “One of the things that we don't really know, at least from commercial polling is to what extent are the people who vote SNP on the constituency and Greens on the list, to what extent are they people who basically are Green supporters, but the Greens are not standing on the constituency or there's waste of time voting for them, or are they SNP supporters going hang on, it's a waste of time voting for the SNP because they're not going to get any more seats in in my region.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings: Covid meetings with devolved leaders 'performance'
“As to the extent to which that divides, I'm not sure.”
The pollster added that the Greens were “doing nicely” out of the power-sharing deal with the SNP so far, with recent polling putting them on course to return a record number of MSPs at the next Scottish Parliament election.
And as Curtice pointed out, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said in the wake of Slater’s comments that his party would run a minority government if they were successful at the next Holyrood ballot.
If that hypothetical situation did occur, Curtice said Labour would likely lean on the Tories for support, rather than the Scottish Greens.
READ MORE: Protesters mob Keir Starmer's car after Gaza speech
“One of the problems Labour will face is they are likely to be in as much of a minority as Salmond was between 2007 and 2011, and will probably ironically be dependent on doing much the same kind of deal as the SNP did between 2007 and 2011 which is basically talking to the Tories,” he said.
“Those are the only ones who are likely to have the number to take them over the line, but how many seats the Tories will get is somewhat in doubt.”
However he caveated that there is a “long way to go” until 2026, and the outcome of the General Election, expected to be held next year, could cause Scottish Labour some issues.
“The same one that bedevilled them in 2007, which is, they’re part of a party that’s unpopular in Westminster,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel