SHADOW foreign secretary David Lammy has said that Israel’s airstrike on a refugee camp in Gaza “can be legally justified”.
Israel has said that strike killed a senior Hamas commander although it is understood that more than 50 civilians were also killed.
Speaking to BBC’s Radio 4 Today programme, Lammy (below) was asked if this kind of attack was “proportionate”.
He replied: “Well look I mean Israel have said that they’ve killed important Hamas commanders.
“And of course they’ve said and reminded the world that Hamas do rely on human shields but I woke up this morning to the heartbreaking and horrific images of a massive crater where people lay clearly under rubble.
“I think it is important for Israel to explain how this conforms with the laws of war, how does it qualify as proportionate because clearly those scenes are very troubling.
“When it comes to the ethics, it’s clear to me that it’s wrong to bomb a refugee camp but clearly if there is a military objective it can be legally justifiable. It’s for Israel to explain its actions.”
READ MORE: Top UN official steps down over 'genocide' of Palestinians
Lammy’s comments come amid reports that the Rafah crossing has opened to allow for limited evacuation of foreign and dual nationals from Gaza to Egypt.
AFP reports that it’s not immediately clear how many people have managed to leave via Rafah but footage from the scene showed crowds of people entering the Palestinian side of the terminal.
David Lammy claims that it 'can be legally justifiable' for Israel to bomb a refugee camp pic.twitter.com/17f8NMjUUZ
— j (@jrc1921) November 1, 2023
Writing on Twitter/X, Foreign Secretary James Cleverly said: “The Rafah crossing is likely to open today for a first group of foreign nationals.
“UK teams are ready to assist British nationals as soon as they are able to leave. It’s vital that lifesaving humanitarian aid can enter Gaza as quickly as possible.”
Meanwhile, Keir Starmer (below) continues to come under pressure to back a ceasefire in Gaza – calls he has so far rejected.
Humza Yousaf was among those to blast the Labour leader for his stance, criticising him for a “lack of moral courage and leadership”.
Asked about Starmer’s view, Lammy was asked if members of the shadow cabinet could disagree with this and keep their jobs.
He replied: “Look we’re all concerned about what’s happening in Gaza. We all want to see the violence stop.
“It’s a clear humanitarian emergency. I recognise that some of our frontbenchers also have been receiving appalling abuse at this time.
“We’re united on our concern about what’s happening in Gaza and one of our great strengths is a party is that we have many people with lived connections across communities.
“So, clearly at this stage we’ve been clear that before October 7 there was a ceasefire effectively that had gone on for many months and years.
“People were crossing the border between Gaza and Israel coming to work. Money was going into Gaza, flowing from Qatar through Israel.
“So we had a ceasefire over three weeks ago. That ceasefire was broken down because of the horrendous terrorist event – the worst in Israel’s history. We have to recognise that.
“It’s right that Israel moves to degrade Hamas’s ability to attack them again.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has been among those to call for a ceasefire as has London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
READ MORE: Desperate audio from Gaza as access to safe water dwindles
Pressed again on whether or not the shadow cabinet could disagree with Starmer or not, Lammy said: “Collective responsibility is hugely important and all shadow cabinet colleagues will be reflecting on that at this difficult time.
“This is dividing families. It’s upsetting people right across the country and the global community.”
He added that all shadow cabinet members “subscribed to collective responsibility” but refused to give a straight answer.
Lammy also said he was unaware of a shadow cabinet member who had “dissented” from the party’s official position.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel