DIVISIONS within Labour are continuing to grow over the party's stance on a ceasefire in Gaza, with Scotland’s newest MP backing Sir Keir Starmer’s position over Anas Sarwar.
Michael Shanks said he backed the UK Labour leader’s call for a “humanitarian pause” rather than a ceasefire supported by the Scottish Labour leader.
Meanwhile Labour shadow foreign minister Fabian Hamilton, the MP for Leeds North East, who is Jewish, has said that now is the “right time to call for a ceasefire”.
Starmer is facing a battle to maintain Labour discipline with members of his frontbench in open revolt about his stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict.
READ MORE: David Lammy: Labour figure slammed for refugee camp bombing comments
He has resisted pressure from within his own party to call for a ceasefire, instead urging both parties in the conflict to agree to a humanitarian pause to allow aid in and people out of the war zone.
Sarwar has criticised the Labour UK leader, claiming he had made “hurtful” comments about the conflict and there was “repair work to do” to mend bridges with Muslim communities.
However the Daily Record reported Shanks, who won the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election last month, has backed his Westminster leader.
Underneath a video of Starmer’s speech this week, he wrote: “In a conflict this complex there are no easy solutions. We all want an end to hostilities and long term peace for Israel and Palestine. Today Keir set out a clear path to achieving that.”
Asked about what would happen at the end of a “humanitarian pause“ and whether innocent people would continue to bear the brunt of military action, he responded: “Appreciate the q and agree that the Palestinian people are not Hamas and don’t deserve to suffer for Hamas’ barbarity.
"I see a humanitarian pause as a means of getting emergency aid to those in Gaza who need it. It won’t end the conflict but it will save lives.
“Your q though is my concern with a ceasefire - if only one side abides by it in what way is it a cessation of hostilities? And even if they did, as Keir outlined it only freezes the conflict as is. A lasting peace is possible but not while Hamas holds hostages and fires rockets.”
Meanwhile in a statement posted today on X, formerly known as Twitter, Labour MP Hamilton said he is a “proud and historic supporter of the Israeli state, alongside a sovereign Palestinian state”.
READ MORE: Gaza's Jabalia refugee camp 'bombed again' - report
But he said the media coverage of children dying and “millions being displaced” by Israeli forces was damaging the country’s reputation across the world and said the conflict must be brought to an end so a “meaningful peace process” can restart for a two state solution.
“We all agree that Palestinian civilians are not Hamas,” he said.
“Hamas deliberately imperils Palestinian civilians in order to protect its warped ideology, whilst continuing to fire rockets indiscriminately at Israeli civilians.
“However, the continued bombing of civilian targets in Gaza fails to make that distinction and raises serious questions about adherence to international law. It also puts the lives of Israeli hostages at risk.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel