CAMPAIGNERS have reacted with anger after the US firm developing Taymouth Castle into a resort for the mega-rich sent out invites to a “community gathering” to discuss the work – but excluded the vast majority of concerned parties.
Discovery Land Company (DLC), which owns Taymouth Castle, the neighbouring 7000-acre Glenlyon Estate, and a host of other properties in the Loch and River Tay area, sent out an invitation to the meeting to people in Kenmore in October.
But residents of other communities on Loch Tay, such as Killin, and nearby towns such as Aberfeldy – where DLC has purchased the 35-acre Moness Resort – are excluded from attending.
READ MORE: US firm 'took one year to answer questions on Loch Tay plans', locals say
Spaces at the November 2 event are limited to two per household and people are asked to submit “your full name, address and postcode along with any questions you wish to ask” in order to register.
The invite, signed by Taymouth Castle general manager David O’Donoghue, makes clear that the event “is exclusively for Kenmore residents, our closest neighbours”.
Campaigners with Protect Loch Tay, a campaign group set up to monitor the development of the historic Taymouth estate, have said the limitations on attendance are “absolutely outrageous”.
A spokesperson added: “This is another box-ticking exercise with public relations in mind. It certainly lacks respect for the many folks who have been waiting months for the opportunity to speak to DLC face-to-face, to voice concerns and ask their questions.”
There have been fresh concerns about DLC’s work after revelations that planning rules had been breached. Developers have started work on a drainage system into the River Tay, despite not having permission.
There were also questions after a B-listed monument on the grounds was smashed.
READ MORE: 'Action must match words': SNP meet US firm behind contentious Taymouth development
DLC alleged, through Perth and Kinross Council, that they suspected vandalism. The company did not respond when asked if and when it had been reported to the police.
A Protect Loch Tay spokesperson said: “At Protect Loch Tay we are shocked, but honestly not surprised at all at Discovery Land Company's ridiculous attempt at a public meeting, as was requested by Protect Loch Tay and then by John Swinney and Pete Wishart.
“As it turns out, invitation only, questions to be submitted in advance, and provide DLC with your name and address? Absolutely outrageous.
“We'd like to ask who has actually been invited? What were the criteria used to select the invited? And how many residents were included? We have heard from residents who have not been included and they are very disappointed.
“This is not what we would call a ‘public meeting’ in any shape or form.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour council spent children's toy fund on promoting coronation
Campaigners went on: “We at Protect Loch Tay are not surprised by insincere actions DLC take in relation to communication, it's how they have behaved all along.
“Tom Collopy himself [DLC’s project manager at Taymouth] previously stated their communication had been inadequate. As ever, it's all smoke and mirrors from DLC, and a blatant refusal to be questioned by those of us who are very concerned.
“Good neighbours? We did invite them to meet for tea and scones, but to date we've had no reply. Running scared?”
DLC was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel