TORY peer Michelle Mone has admitted her involvement with a “VIP lane” PPE company for the first time.
PPE Medpro was awarded UK Government contracts worth £200 million during the Covid pandemic, and Mone and her husband Douglas Barrowman have consistently and repeatedly denied any involvement with the firm in the past.
Glasgow-born Baroness Mone began a leave of absence from the House of Lords in December 2022 as pressure and controversy mounted over her links to the PPE contract.
READ MORE: Top UN official says UK 'violating international law' with poverty levels
In 2020, Mone’s lawyer stated categorically that she was “not connected in any way with PPE Medpro”, with Barrowman’s lawyers repeatedly denying he was an investor in the company and that he “never had any role or function” with the firm.
However, a representative for the couple and spokesperson for PPE Medpro admitted in response to the Guardian that disputed the previous assertions made to the newspaper.
The representative told the Guardian: “The UK Government was fully aware of Baroness Mone’s involvement; like many other peers and MPs on the high priority lane, she acted as an intermediary/liaison between PPE Medpro and the Cabinet Office/Department of Health and Social Care.”
They added that Barrowman, who runs tax and wealth advisory firm Knox Group based in the Isle of Man, “was the chairman and leader of the PPE Medpro consortium that supplied the UK government”.
The “consortium” was a partnership between PPE Medpro and Loudwater Trade and Finance, based in London, and Hong Kong firm Eric Beare Associates, which were involved in sourcing the PPE.
Barrowman provided half the money up front through his “family office”, through the Knox firm controlled by him and is understood to manage his private wealth.
“The Knox 50% was provided by the Family Office of Doug Barrowman,” the representative said.
PPE Medpro were granted two contracts by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) in May and June 2020 in the early months of the pandemic, to supply millions of face masks and sterile surgical counts. The contracts amounted to a total of £203 million.
READ MORE: Claire Coutinho: Oil and gas licences plan may ‘not necessarily’ decrease bills
Later that year when the contracts were made public, Mone and Barrowman repeatedly denied involvement with the firm.
Barrowman was reportedly paid at least £65m from PPE Medpro’s profits, later transferring £29m into a trust for Mone and her three adult children.
In a new statement released to the Guardian, the couple’s representative said the pair had informed the government they were involved in the firm from the beginning.
“Both Doug Barrowman and his wife, Baroness Mone, made a full written disclosure of their involvement to the Cabinet Office prior to the award of the PPE contracts,” the representative said.
“The UK Government was fully aware of Mr Barrowman’s role and that his group would make a commercial profit.”
We told last year how the UK Government had initiated legal action against PPE Medpro for breach of contract over the supply of sterile gowns, with reports suggesting officials were seeking to recoup £122m plus further costs.
And, prior to taking a leave of absence from the Lords, tens of thousands of people signed a petition calling for Mone to be expelled from the second House and her Baroness title removed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel