THE Home Secretary has labelled pro-Palestine demonstrations as “displays of thuggish intimidation and extremism”.
It comes as the Metropolitan Police has urged organisers of demonstrations this weekend to consider postponing.
In a statement, the Met said: “The risk of violence and disorder linked to breakaway groups is growing.
“This is of concern ahead of a significant and busy weekend. Our message to organisers is clear. Please, we ask you to urgently reconsider.
“It is not appropriate to hold any protests in London this weekend.”
Scotland’s First Minister has already said any demonstrations should “absolutely” go ahead as he expressed his anger with the UK Government’s response to the plans.
Reacting to the Met’s statement, Suella Braverman posted on Twitter/X: “I welcome this statement from the Met Police.
“The hate marchers need to understand that decent British people have had enough of these displays of thuggish intimidation and extremism.”
Yousaf has already said that Braverman’s description of the demonstrations as “hate marches” is “unacceptable”.
READ MORE: SNP plot with Labour over forcing Israel-Hamas ceasefire vote
The planned march in London this weekend would see demonstrators walk from Hyde Park to the US Embassy.
Speaking to journalists in Dundee on Monday, the First Minister said: “I am beyond angry at the Home Secretary and the UK Government who seem to want to drive every issue into a culture war.
“Describing those marches as hate marches is disgraceful, unacceptable.”
He added that “you’ll get one or two idiots who will do and say something that we all universally condemn” at marches but that “this UK Government is unfit for office and certainly the Home Secretary is unfit for office”.
Meanwhile, Braverman's own Cabinet colleague Alex Chalk (below) declined to repeat her description of demonstrations as "hate marches".
The Justice Secretary denied that the differing language was a sign of "confusion" in Government however.
He said: “There is no doubt there are elements on these marches that I’m afraid are espousing hate … but equally there will be those people who are there expressing their anguish at some of the untold suffering.
“The concern must be whether those people who have perfectly legitimate intentions and concerns are directly or indirectly supporting those people who are espousing hate.”
Asked whether it was a sign of confusion over language, he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “It’s not confusion. I think it’s an issue of semantics. The Home Secretary is absolutely correct when she says that there is hate on these marches.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel