SENIOR Tories have sought to distance themselves from an “out of control” Suella Braverman following her article in The Times.
The Home Secretary accused police of “double standards” and “playing favourites” with protesters as a pro-Palestine march on Armistice Day looks set to go ahead in London.
She said: “I do not believe that these marches are merely a cry for help for Gaza.
“They are an assertion of primacy by certain groups — particularly Islamists — of the kind we are more used to seeing in Northern Ireland. Also disturbingly reminiscent of Ulster are the reports that some of Saturday’s march group organisers have links to terrorist groups, including Hamas.”
Transport Secretary Mark Harper (below) has already disagreed with Braverman’s claims, telling Times Radio: “I think all police forces are focused on upholding the law without fear or favour. That’s what they do.”
He also declined to comment on whether or not he agreed with the overall piece. Harper added: “I’m not going to indulge in textual analysis of her article.”
He said police have been “focusing very hard on making sure that we don’t see any disturbance and disorder” at remembrance events this weekend.
Elsewhere, he told Good Morning Britain that although he disagreed with the march taking place on Armistice Day, people “have the right to do that in a free country”.
Braverman's article added: “Right-wing and nationalist protesters who engage in aggression are rightly met with a stern response yet pro-Palestinian mobs displaying almost identical behaviour are largely ignored, even when clearly breaking the law?
“I have spoken to serving and former police officers who have noted this double standard.
“Football fans are even more vocal about the tough way they are policed as compared to politically connected minority groups favoured by the left.
“It may be that senior officers are more concerned with how much flak they are likely to get than whether this perceived unfairness alienates the majority. The Government has a duty to take a broader view.”
READ MORE: Why are Tories stoking a culture war over Armistice Day and Palestine? An expert explains
Sky News’s political editor Beth Rigby has reported that multiple Tories have been left fuming with the remarks.
Writing on Twitter/X, she said: “One senior Tory tells me Braverman position ‘must be questioned’ because she’s making police job harder upholding peace and law & order with her language.
“Also points out protests have in past taken place on Remembrance Sunday & been policed.”
A separate post added: “Another MP says whips ‘aren’t even trying to defend her’ in convos (with) MPs.
“As for fallout (for) PM ‘if he sacks her it looks like media/Labour pressure’, I think Lab attack ad that he’s weak hits hard & think it’ll stick, because he is’.”
Opposition reaction
Labour’s Yvette Cooper (below) has said that Braverman is “out of control”, while shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds told Sky News the PM should “of course” sack his Home Secretary.
“Where is the Prime Minister on this? Do we believe the Prime Minister signed off that kind of inflammatory rhetoric? He won’t tell us,” he said.
“We have to find out today from the Prime Minister did he sign off? Did he agree to this? And if not, is he too weak to sack her?”
Writing on Twitter/X, SNP MP Stewart McDonald said: “Suella Braverman has become so radicalised by her own ambition to lead the Conservative Party further down the sewer that she is wholly unfit to hold office.
“Every day that she remains in post is another day of shame for this decaying government and spineless prime minister.”
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak admits Palestine protest won't clash with Remembrance event
Meanwhile, the LibDems' home affairs spokesman Alistair Carmichael said: “Suella Braverman is running a Conservative Party leadership campaign, not the Home Office.
“The Home Secretary’s desire to stoke divisions and ramp up tensions in this way is irresponsible and dangerous.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel