POWER firm SSEN has warned "the lights will go out" if Scottish Government ministers accept Highland councillors’ objection to its planned transmission line upgrade in Skye.
Members of the council’s north and south planning committees oppose the scale of the £500 million scheme based on the grounds of potential impacts on communities and the natural environment.
The 100-mile line would transmit electricity generated by renewable projects between north west Skye and Fort Augustus on the mainland.
The power firm has said new lines are crucial in order to help the UK and Scottish Government meet targets for renewable energy.
READ MORE: SNP write to party leaders to call for ceasefire vote support
As consultees, councillors were invited to comment and voted 11-9 to object to the planning application after a debate in Inverness on Wednesday.
In a statement, SSEN Transmission said: “We are extremely disappointed by the council’s decision to object to our project following the recent submission of additional information, which goes against the recommendation of the council’s planning officers and committee’s previous decision.
“The existing overhead line was built in the 1950s and is fast reaching the end of its operational life, as demonstrated by two major faults earlier this year which resulted in the temporary loss of power to over 20,000 customers with its replacement critical to keep the lights on for homes and businesses across Skye and in the Western Isles.
“It will also enable the connection of new renewable electricity generation along its route, supporting energy security and climate change targets.
“We now look forward to the Scottish Government’s timely determination of our Section 37 application and remain committed to work constructively with all stakeholders to deliver this critical national infrastructure, which is essential to keep the lights on and support the transition to net zero.”
READ MORE: Pro-Palestinian protesters arrested after scaling Scottish Parliament
The new line is part of proposals to strengthen transmission links to help achieve governmental 2045 carbon emission targets.
SSEN estimates the Skye link would take around three years to construct and a further seven months to remove outdated equipment.
However, a number of councillors complained there had been a lack of commitment to community benefit from the project.
Independent Dingwall and Seaforth councillor Margaret Paterson warned islanders would “lose their peace” if the application was approved and that residents “won’t allow Skye to be trashed”.
SNP Skye councillor Drew Millar moved the objection to the planning application and was seconded by fellow island councillor Ruraidh Stewart, who leads the council’s Conservative group.
The motion acknowledged the need for the transmission line but questioned the scale of SSEN’s proposal.
Andrew Robinson of the Skye Windfarm Information Group said: “Skye’s a beautiful, world renowned landscape. We depend on tourism for the economy.
READ MORE: Douglas Murray slammed for 'disgusting' attack on Humza Yousaf
“SSEN are pulling a fast one. They’re trying to persuade us it’s necessary to build a line of this scale and it’s not necessary.
“They could replace the line that’s already there with slightly increased capacity. That would keep the lights on, on Skye and the outer isles.”
Scottish Government ministers will decide whether the application is approved or not.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel