SUELLA Braveman has insisted "further action is necessary" following a pro-Palestine march in London on Armistice Day.
The Home Secretary has been blamed for emboldening far-right activists who attacked the Metropolitan Police on Saturday after she wrote a column accusing the force of "playing favourites" with protesters and having "double standards".
Dozens of counter-protesters were arrested, including many trying to confront those participating in the pro-Palestine march which Sunak and Braverman had urged police to ban.
Rishi Sunak is coming under severe pressure from all sides to sack her, given her piece was also not signed off by Number 10.
But the reaction to her explosive column does not seem to have quietened the Home Secretary.
READ MORE: New Scot councillors: We feel welcome but council pay is 'ridiculous'
In her first public statement since the scenes of far-right violence in London, Braverman said on Twitter/X the "criminal chants" at the pro-Palestine march marked "a new low" and called for further acton to be taken against demonstrators.
She said: "Our brave police officers deserve the thanks of every decent citizen for their professionalism in the face of violence and aggression from protesters and counter protesters in London yesterday. That multiple officers were injured doing their duty is an outrage.
"The sick, inflammatory and, in some cases, clearly criminal chants, placards and paraphernalia openly on display at the march mark a new low. Antisemitism and other forms of racism together with the valorising of terrorism on such a scale is deeply troubling.
"This can’t go on. Week by week, the streets of London are being polluted by hate, violence, and antisemitism. Members of the public are being mobbed and intimidated. Jewish people in particular feel threatened. Further action is necessary."
An official UK Government review is arguing for a change in the law so that police can ban pro-Palestinian marches.
READ MORE: Nadia El-Nakla thanks pro-Palestine marchers in emotional message
The UK Government’s independent adviser on political violence and disruption, John Woodcock - known as Lord Walney - told The Telegraph that he was recommending the change because of the impact of recent marches on the Jewish community.
The peer - who was nominated by Boris Johnson in 2021 to lead a review- said there had been an “explosion” in anti-semitic incidents linked to the marches and that he would be “looking at the threshold for the police to ban [them]”.
The Public Order Act makes it possible for the police to ban a procession if there is a risk of serious public disorder, but Woodcock believes it doesn’t consider the wider impact on vulnerable groups.
First Minister Humza Yousaf has called for Braverman to be sacked and not allowed to resign.
Speaking to journalists as he arrived at Remembrance Day commemorations in Edinburgh, the First Minister accused the Home Secretary of “fanning the flames of division”.
Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s leader in Westminster, said the police should be able to operate “free from the influence of politicians”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel