IT IS “not acceptable” that Foreign Secretary David Cameron will be able to avoid being grilled by MPs because of his position in the House of Lords, a senior SNP politician has said.
The former Tory prime minister is set to be ennobled to allow him to take on one of the four Great Offices of State - despite no longer being an MP.
The undemocratic nature of the appointment caused concern amongst campaigners and politicians after Cameron was surprisingly confirmed to be returning to Government on Monday.
READ MORE: RECAP: David Cameron appointed Foreign Secretary in Cabinet reshuffle
As Cameron will be a member of the Lords, after he is ennobled, rather than the House of Commons, he will not have to answer scheduled departmental questions from MPs.
He will be able to take departmental questions in the Lords chamber, and will still be accountable to MPs via Commons select committees as a Government minister.
But, it will be a junior official from the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) who will face MPs in the Commons, not Cameron.
Campaigners said the appointment brings more urgency to calls for the Lords to be reformed and an elected second House to be established instead. The Lords now has almost 800 members, all unelected.
And, many raised Cameron’s involvement at the centre of a major scandal during the pandemic - where it emerged he had privately lobbied ministers in a bid to secure emergency coronavirus loans for the failed firm Greensill Capital, where he took a role in 2018.
One campaign group dubbed Cameron’s Lords’ appointment as a “lobbyist's dream”.
Ian Blackford, the SNP’s former Westminster group leader and the party's independence business ambassador, told The National Cameron’s appointment was not a normal way for democracy to operate.
He said: “It's not acceptable anytime, but my goodness we’re in the midst of a war in Ukraine, in the midst of what is an enormous conflict in the Middle East, that goodness knows what the consequences of this could be, and the principal officer of the government isn't available to meet with Members of Parliament who are sent by their constituents to represent them, and they cannot speak directly in the chamber with the Foreign Secretary with his words on the record.
“That is not right.”
READ MORE: Tory party mocked for cringey use of emojis during Cabinet reshuffle
Blackford (below), an MP since 2015, said that the Parliament has to be able to function in a way that ministers can be questioned by elected representatives.
“That happens on a formal basis, but it happens informally as well because you're always bumping into people, you build relationships with people,” he added.
“He's not going to come to the chamber, he's not going to be answering questions - he's going to be sending junior ministers. It's not okay.”
Darren Hughes, chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society said that the public will rightly be “baffled and confused” by Cameron’s appointment despite the fact he is no longer an MP. The former prime minister quit as an MP in 2016 when he left Number 10, claiming he wanted to “avoid being a distraction” on the backbenches.
Hughes said: “While it is common for government departments to have a junior minister from the Lords to ensure representation in the upper chamber, it is unprecedented in modern times for a former Prime Minister to be handed a job-for-life in the upper house so they can immediately take up one of the great offices of state.
“There is also an irony that a Prime Minister who tried and failed to make the Lords an elected chamber is now sitting on its benches unelected.”
The lack of a “democratic process”, Hughes said, highlights an “outdated and unfit” system in Westminster.
“The Lords urgently needs to be scrapped and replaced with a smaller elected chamber, which will give it a sustainable democratic basis and ensure that the people of this country, not politicians, decide who sits in parliament,” he added.
READ MORE: Suella Braverman's worst moments as home secretary
Graham Smith (below), CEO of the anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, joined calls for reform of the Lords in the wake of Cameron’s appointment.
He told The National: “Cabinet ministers must come from the Commons, where they can be held accountable by our elected representatives.
“If Cameron wants to return to Cabinet he should seek election to Parliament, not be parachuted in by a Prime Minister desperate to shore up his unpopular government.
“This appointment joins a string of recent outrages that remind us of the urgent need to ditch the Lords in favour of an elected upper house.”
Tom Brake, from pressure group Unlock Democracy, pointed out that it has been over 40 years since a Foreign Secretary was not an MP - when Alec Douglas-Home was appointed in the 1970s.
"MPs, Parliament's elected officials, expect to be able to hold these post-holders to account and so do voters in General Elections,” he said.
“This line of accountability is now shattered. This appointment underlines yet again the need to reform the House of Lords and replace it with an elected and accountable chamber."
It comes as Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle told MPs that he had commissioned advice from parliamentary officials to ensure the Foreign Office’s work is scrutinised “effectively” with Cameron sitting in the Lords, particularly given the “gravity of the current international situation”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel